Georgievski Zoran, Koklanis Konstandina, Leone Josie
Department of Clinical Vision Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Strabismus. 2007 Oct-Dec;15(4):197-203. doi: 10.1080/09273970701631975.
The aim of this study was to investigate the amblyopia treatment trends of Australian orthoptists and to identify variations or consistencies amongst treatment patterns.
A questionnaire was distributed to all orthoptists who attended an annual national scientific conference. This questionnaire consisted of four case vignettes of amblyopic patients. Each was presented with a series of multiple-choice questions that orthoptists were required to answer.
The questionnaire was completed by 46 orthoptists. Large diversity between orthoptists in their treatment application was found. This related mostly to the intensity of occlusion treatment.
Treatment variability continues to exist between orthoptists. Further investigations evaluating the clinical decision making processes of clinicians in prescribing amblyopia treatment may help us to better understand the determinants that are considered when prescribing treatment. This would be useful in establishing best-practice guidelines.
本研究旨在调查澳大利亚视光师的弱视治疗趋势,并确定治疗模式中的差异或一致性。
向所有参加年度全国科学会议的视光师发放了一份问卷。该问卷包含四个弱视患者的病例 vignettes。每个 vignette 都配有一系列视光师需要回答的多项选择题。
46 名视光师完成了问卷。发现视光师在治疗应用方面存在很大差异。这主要与遮盖治疗的强度有关。
视光师之间的治疗差异仍然存在。进一步评估临床医生在开具弱视治疗处方时的临床决策过程的研究,可能有助于我们更好地理解开具治疗处方时所考虑的决定因素。这将有助于建立最佳实践指南。