Suppr超能文献

健康志愿者中硫辛酸两种制剂生物等效性的比较交叉、随机、开放标签生物等效性研究。

Comparative crossover, randomized, open-label bioequivalence study on the bioequivalence of two formulations of thioctic acid in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Mignini Fiorenzo, Streccioni Valentino, Tomassoni Daniele, Traini Enea, Amenta Francesco

机构信息

Centro di Ricerche Cliniche, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Sanità Pubblica, Università di Camerino, Camerino, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Hypertens. 2007 Nov;29(8):575-86. doi: 10.1080/10641960701744111.

Abstract

An open-label, randomized, crossover single-dose study, using two periods and two sequences with a washout period of seven days was conducted to assess the comparative bioavailability of thioctic (alpha-lipoic) acid (ALA) 600 mg formulation and that of a reference formulation. Blood samples were collected up to +6 h post dosing, the plasma was separated, and thioctic acid concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic method with single mass spectrometry detection (HPLC-MS) and a lower limit of quantification of 190.1 ng/ml. Mean values of the individual C(max) were 1338.6 +/- 751.8 ng/ml and 1215.8 +/- 560.5 ng/ml for the test and reference preparations, respectively. Mean +/- standard deviation (SD) total area under the curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUC(t)) was 3510.9 +/- 1088.6 ng x h/ml for the test formulation and 3563.5 +/- 1374.1 ng x h/ml for the reference formulation. Mean +/- SD total area under the curve (AUC(inf)) was 6925.6 +/- 4045.8 ng x h/ml for the test formulation and 7797.1 +/- 5963.1 ng x h/ml for the reference preparation. Terminal elimination half-life was 5.68 +/- 5.05 h for the test and 6.11 +/- 6.15 h for the reference formulations. Time of maximum concentration (t(max)) was 1.24 +/- 1.23 h for the test and 2.05 +/- 1.21 h for the reference formulations. Ninety percent confidence intervals were comprised within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria (80-125%) for all of the parameters analyzed except t(max). The comparison between males and females showed no significant difference for the two drug treatment.

摘要

开展了一项开放标签、随机、交叉单剂量研究,采用两个周期和两个序列,洗脱期为7天,以评估硫辛酸(α-硫辛酸)600毫克制剂与参比制剂的相对生物利用度。给药后直至6小时采集血样,分离血浆,采用高效液相色谱法结合单重质谱检测(HPLC-MS)测定硫辛酸浓度,定量下限为190.1纳克/毫升。试验制剂和参比制剂的个体C(max)平均值分别为1338.6±751.8纳克/毫升和1215.8±560.5纳克/毫升。试验制剂和参比制剂直至最后可测浓度的曲线下平均±标准差(SD)总面积(AUC(t))分别为3510.9±1088.6纳克·小时/毫升和3563.5±1374.1纳克·小时/毫升。试验制剂和参比制剂的曲线下平均±SD总面积(AUC(inf))分别为6925.6±4045.8纳克·小时/毫升和7797.1±5963.1纳克·小时/毫升。试验制剂的终末消除半衰期为5.68±5.05小时,参比制剂为6.11±6.15小时。试验制剂达到最大浓度的时间(t(max))为1.24±1.23小时,参比制剂为2.05±1.21小时。除t(max)外,所有分析参数的90%置信区间均在生物等效性接受标准(80-125%)范围内。两种药物治疗在男性和女性之间的比较未显示出显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验