Suppr超能文献

自主呼吸的气管切开患者的下呼吸道湿化:气管喷雾与加热湿化器的对比研究

Lower airway humidification in spontaneously breathing tracheostomized patients: comparative study of trachea spray versus heated humidifier.

作者信息

Keck Tilman, Rozsasi Ajnacska, Leiacker Richard, Scheithauer Marc Oliver

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2008 May;30(5):582-8. doi: 10.1002/hed.20742.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare inhalation with molecular water (vaporizing humidifier) and particulate water (trachea spray) in spontaneously breathing tracheostomized patients.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, 2-way crossover study and a prospective, comparative, nonblinded study. Tracheal humidity and temperature were measured before and after use of a humidifier and spray for 1 week.

RESULTS

After both inhalation and spray, the tracheal temperature and total water content increased significantly (study 1). The temperature gradient between ambient and tracheal air was significantly higher after spray, but not after inhalation (study 2). The water gradient increased nonsignificantly after spray and inhalation. The water gradient after inhalation or spray did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular water is not superior to particulate water because of temperature and humidity increase after both forms of water delivery. Because of its easy use, portability, and moisturizing effect, a trachea spray may offer additional options in postoperative tracheostomy care.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是比较在自主呼吸的气管切开患者中使用分子水(汽化加湿器)和颗粒水(气管喷雾)进行吸入的效果。

方法

我们进行了一项随机、双向交叉研究以及一项前瞻性、比较性、非盲法研究。在使用加湿器和喷雾1周前后测量气管湿度和温度。

结果

吸入和喷雾后,气管温度和总含水量均显著升高(研究1)。喷雾后环境空气与气管空气之间的温度梯度显著更高,但吸入后并非如此(研究2)。喷雾和吸入后水梯度无显著增加。吸入或喷雾后的水梯度无显著差异。

结论

由于两种输水方式后温度和湿度均升高,分子水并不优于颗粒水。由于其使用方便、便携且具有保湿效果,气管喷雾可能为气管切开术后护理提供更多选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验