Keck Tilman, Rozsasi Ajnacska, Leiacker Richard, Scheithauer Marc Oliver
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Head Neck. 2008 May;30(5):582-8. doi: 10.1002/hed.20742.
Our aim was to compare inhalation with molecular water (vaporizing humidifier) and particulate water (trachea spray) in spontaneously breathing tracheostomized patients.
We performed a randomized, 2-way crossover study and a prospective, comparative, nonblinded study. Tracheal humidity and temperature were measured before and after use of a humidifier and spray for 1 week.
After both inhalation and spray, the tracheal temperature and total water content increased significantly (study 1). The temperature gradient between ambient and tracheal air was significantly higher after spray, but not after inhalation (study 2). The water gradient increased nonsignificantly after spray and inhalation. The water gradient after inhalation or spray did not differ significantly.
Molecular water is not superior to particulate water because of temperature and humidity increase after both forms of water delivery. Because of its easy use, portability, and moisturizing effect, a trachea spray may offer additional options in postoperative tracheostomy care.
我们的目的是比较在自主呼吸的气管切开患者中使用分子水(汽化加湿器)和颗粒水(气管喷雾)进行吸入的效果。
我们进行了一项随机、双向交叉研究以及一项前瞻性、比较性、非盲法研究。在使用加湿器和喷雾1周前后测量气管湿度和温度。
吸入和喷雾后,气管温度和总含水量均显著升高(研究1)。喷雾后环境空气与气管空气之间的温度梯度显著更高,但吸入后并非如此(研究2)。喷雾和吸入后水梯度无显著增加。吸入或喷雾后的水梯度无显著差异。
由于两种输水方式后温度和湿度均升高,分子水并不优于颗粒水。由于其使用方便、便携且具有保湿效果,气管喷雾可能为气管切开术后护理提供更多选择。