要么放弃自由，要么失去生命。关于公共卫生与公民自由的讨论要点。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Your liberty or your life. Talking Point on public health versus civil liberties.

作者信息

Annas George J

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Bioethics and Human Rights at Boston University's School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

EMBO Rep. 2007 Dec;8(12):1093-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401133.

DOI:10.1038/sj.embor.7401133

PMID:18059306

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2267247/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de53/2267247/d9cb06ee6479/7401133-i1.jpg

相似文献

Your liberty or your life. Talking Point on public health versus civil liberties.要么放弃自由，要么失去生命。关于公共卫生与公民自由的讨论要点。

EMBO Rep. 2007 Dec;8(12):1093-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401133.

The continuing tensions between individual rights and public health. Talking Point on public health versus civil liberties.个人权利与公共卫生之间持续存在的紧张关系。关于公共卫生与公民自由的谈话要点。

EMBO Rep. 2007 Dec;8(12):1099-103. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401134.

Public health and civil liberties. Introduction to the talking point on public health versus civil liberties.公共卫生与公民自由。关于公共卫生与公民自由的讨论要点介绍。

EMBO Rep. 2007 Dec;8(12):1091-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401132.

Bioterrorism, public health, and civil liberties.生物恐怖主义、公共卫生与公民自由。

N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 25;346(17):1337-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200204253461722.

Public health and civil liberties in an era of bioterrorism.生物恐怖主义时代的公共卫生与公民自由

Crim Justice Ethics. 2002 Summer;21(2):2, 74-6. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.2002.9992120.

Law and ethics in a public health emergency.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2002 Mar-Apr;32(2):9-11.

Bioterrorism, public health, and human rights.生物恐怖主义、公共卫生与人权。

Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):94-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.94.

Balancing public health and civil liberties.

Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2129; author reply 2129. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5601.2129c.

Bioterrorism, public health, and the law.生物恐怖主义、公共卫生与法律。

Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):98-101. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.98.

When terrorism threatens health: how far are limitations on personal and economic liberties justified?当恐怖主义威胁健康时：对个人自由和经济自由的限制在多大程度上是合理的？

Fla Law Rev. 2003 Dec;55(5):1105-70.

引用本文的文献

A One Health Approach to Public Safety: A Review of Police Canines in the United States.一种关注公共安全的整体健康方法：美国警犬的回顾。

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;21(9):1235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091235.

本文引用的文献

Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle.风险、预防措施与科学：迈向更具建设性的政策辩论。关于预防原则的讨论要点。

EMBO Rep. 2007 Apr;8(4):309-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.

The war on disease and the war on terror: a dangerous metaphorical nexus?

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2006 Fall;15(4):403-16. doi: 10.1017/s0963180106060518.

The pandemic threat: are we prepared?大流行威胁：我们做好准备了吗？

Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum). 2006 Jun 8(29):1-14.

The statue of security: human rights and post-9/11 epidemics.

J Health Law. 2005 Spring;38(2):319-51.

Puppy love: bioterrorism, civil rights, and public health.初恋：生物恐怖主义、公民权利与公共卫生。

Fla Law Rev. 2003 Dec;55(5):1171-90.

Fla Law Rev. 2003 Dec;55(5):1105-70.

Ethical and legal challenges posed by severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for the control of severe infectious disease threats.严重急性呼吸综合征带来的伦理和法律挑战：对控制严重传染病威胁的启示

JAMA. 2003 Dec 24;290(24):3229-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.24.3229.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验