Leiva J, Plata J, Martínez M J, Narbona F E, Mendoza J, Navarro J M, de la Rosa M
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1991 Oct;9(8):464-7.
In order to establish the possible influence of Brucella melitensis rough strains protein extracts contamination using LPS (R) in the immunoblotting evaluation of serologic response, we have studied sera samples from 41 patients with acute brucellosis before treatment was started and also from 62 healthy individuals (control group). A whole-cell B. melitensis 115 strain extract with an without LPS (R) was used. Extraction was carried using ether-chloroform of oil-phenol. Overall, more than 50% of patients showed an antibody response (protein bands 85, 53, 50, 47, 41, 38 and 28 kD) to both antigenic products. Less than 6.4% of the control group sera showed response to any of these protein bands. There were no significant differences in the frequency of response development against these proteins using the two antigen types. However, there was some disagreement when each individual band response was compared to its homologous band.
为了确定在布鲁氏菌病血清学反应的免疫印迹评估中,使用粗糙型脂多糖(LPS (R))的流产布鲁氏菌粗糙菌株蛋白提取物污染可能产生的影响,我们研究了41例急性布鲁氏菌病患者在开始治疗前的血清样本,以及62名健康个体(对照组)的血清样本。使用了含有和不含有LPS (R)的全细胞流产布鲁氏菌115菌株提取物。提取采用乙醚-氯仿和油-酚法。总体而言,超过50%的患者对两种抗原产物均表现出抗体反应(蛋白条带85、53、50、47、41、38和28 kD)。对照组血清中不到6.4%的样本对这些蛋白条带中的任何一条有反应。使用这两种抗原类型时,针对这些蛋白产生反应的频率没有显著差异。然而,当将各个条带的反应与其同源条带进行比较时,存在一些不一致的情况。