• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

承重面设计的改变会影响全膝关节置换术中的接触模式。

Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Cottrell Jocelyn M, Townsend Elizabeth, Lipman Joseph, Sculco Thomas P, Wright Timothy M

机构信息

Biomechanics Laboratory, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:127-31.

PMID:18062045
Abstract

The impact of design changes intended to improve wear of knee replacements can be assessed from analysis of retrieved implants. We hypothesized changes in bearing surface conformity from the Insall-Burstein II knee to a successor, the Optetrak, intended to improve contact stresses would be apparent in wear patterns observed on retrieved tibial inserts. From 151 Insall-Burstein II and 54 Optetrak retrieved components, 35 pairs (Insall-Burstein II and Optetrak) were matched on length of implantation, body mass index, and age. Digital images of the bearing surfaces were used to identify and measure wear modes, which were then converted to a percentage of the total possible contact area. Burnishing was the most prevalent mode for both designs followed by scratching and then pitting. The percentage of involved area was greater for the Optetrak for 23 pairs. Interestingly, for the nine matched pairs with length of implantation longer than 2 years, six of the Insall-Burstein II inserts had considerably greater scratching and pitting and five exhibited abrasion and creep absent from Optetrak implants. Bearing surface design is a major factor that can affect kinematics and contact patterns. Our observations confirm the considerable impact of small changes in conformity and suggest models predicting contact stresses adequately reflect in vivo performance.

摘要

旨在改善膝关节置换假体磨损的设计变更的影响可通过对取出的植入物进行分析来评估。我们假设,从Insall-Burstein II膝关节到其继任者Optetrak膝关节,其承重表面贴合度的变化旨在改善接触应力,这在取出的胫骨衬垫上观察到的磨损模式中会很明显。在151个取出的Insall-Burstein II组件和54个取出的Optetrak组件中,35对(Insall-Burstein II和Optetrak)在植入时间、体重指数和年龄方面进行了匹配。利用承重表面的数字图像来识别和测量磨损模式,然后将其转换为总可能接触面积的百分比。两种设计中,打磨都是最普遍的磨损模式,其次是刮擦,然后是点蚀。Optetrak的23对组件的受累面积百分比更大。有趣的是,对于植入时间超过2年的9对匹配组件,Insall-Burstein II衬垫中有6个有相当大的刮擦和点蚀,5个出现了Optetrak植入物中不存在的磨损和蠕变。承重表面设计是影响运动学和接触模式的一个主要因素。我们的观察结果证实了贴合度的微小变化会产生相当大的影响,并表明预测接触应力的模型能够充分反映体内性能。

相似文献

1
Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty.承重面设计的改变会影响全膝关节置换术中的接触模式。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:127-31.
2
Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts.对可移动和固定承轴膝关节植入物的磨损分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 8.
3
Wear-pattern analysis in retrieved tibial inserts of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prostheses.活动平台和固定平台全膝关节假体取出的胫骨衬垫磨损模式分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):500-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22560.
4
Polyethylene damage and deformation on fixed-bearing, non-conforming unicondylar knee replacements corresponding to progressive changes in alignment and fixation.固定平台、不匹配型单髁膝关节置换术中聚乙烯的损伤和变形与对线和固定的渐进性变化相关。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Jul;25(6):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 May 8.
5
Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear.活动平台膝关节可减少旋转不对称磨损。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Sep;462:143-9. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31806dba05.
6
Kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.活动平台全膝关节置换术的运动学
Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:207-20.
7
Quantification of polyethylene degradation in mobile bearing knees: a retrieval analysis of the Anterior-Posterior-Glide (APG) and Rotating Platform (RP) Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee.活动轴承膝关节中聚乙烯磨损的定量分析:前后滑动(APG)和旋转平台(RP)低接触应力(LCS)膝关节的翻修分析
Acta Orthop. 2007 Jun;78(3):364-70. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013942.
8
Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.取出的胫骨聚乙烯衬垫中与关节损伤相对应的后侧损伤。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:137-44. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180320b01.
9
An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics.活动平台膝关节胫骨对合面聚乙烯磨损的实验模型:设计与运动学的影响
Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;9(3):189-96.
10
Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.短期内,高度交联聚乙烯胫骨插入物并不能减少表面损伤。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):107-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4344-4.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Incidence of Cobalt-Chromium Damage Modes on the Bearing Surface of Contemporary Femoral Component Designs for Total Knee Arthroplasty?当代全膝关节置换术股骨组件设计的承载表面钴铬损伤模式的发生率是多少?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3313-3319. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
Crosslink Density Is Reduced and Oxidation Is Increased in Retrieved Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene TKA Tibial Inserts.翻修的高度交联聚乙烯全膝关节置换术胫骨假体衬垫的交联密度降低且氧化增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):128-136. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4820-5.
3
Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.
短期内,高度交联聚乙烯胫骨插入物并不能减少表面损伤。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):107-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4344-4.
4
Wear behavior of an unstable knee: stabilization via implant design?不稳定膝关节的磨损行为:通过植入物设计实现稳定?
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:821475. doi: 10.1155/2014/821475. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
[Revision rates in journal publications on joint prostheses with noticeably high failure rates in register data sets].[登记数据集中故障率明显较高的关节假体的期刊出版物修订率]
Orthopade. 2012 Oct;41(10):853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-012-1945-4.
6
Rotating-platform knee arthroplasty: a review and update.旋转平台膝关节置换:综述与更新。
Orthop Surg. 2011 Nov;3(4):224-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00156.x.
7
Wear damage in mobile-bearing TKA is as severe as that in fixed-bearing TKA.活动衬垫型膝关节置换术中的磨损损伤与固定衬垫型膝关节置换术一样严重。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1557-4.