• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类内侧前额叶皮质活动可预测从错误中学习的能力。

Human medial frontal cortex activity predicts learning from errors.

作者信息

Hester Robert, Barre Natalie, Murphy Kevin, Silk Tim J, Mattingley Jason B

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Queensland Brain Institute and School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2008 Aug;18(8):1933-40. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm219. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhm219
PMID:18063560
Abstract

Learning from errors is a critical feature of human cognition. It underlies our ability to adapt to changing environmental demands and to tune behavior for optimal performance. The posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) has been implicated in the evaluation of errors to control behavior, although it has not previously been shown that activity in this region predicts learning from errors. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined activity in the pMFC during an associative learning task in which participants had to recall the spatial locations of 2-digit targets and were provided with immediate feedback regarding accuracy. Activity within the pMFC was significantly greater for errors that were subsequently corrected than for errors that were repeated. Moreover, pMFC activity during recall errors predicted future responses (correct vs. incorrect), despite a sizeable interval (on average 70 s) between an error and the next presentation of the same recall probe. Activity within the hippocampus also predicted future performance and correlated with error-feedback-related pMFC activity. A relationship between performance expectations and pMFC activity, in the absence of differing reinforcement value for errors, is consistent with the idea that error-related pMFC activity reflects the extent to which an outcome is "worse than expected."

摘要

从错误中学习是人类认知的一个关键特征。它是我们适应不断变化的环境需求以及调整行为以实现最佳表现的能力的基础。后内侧额叶皮层(pMFC)已被认为与错误评估以控制行为有关,尽管此前尚未表明该区域的活动能预测从错误中学习。我们使用功能磁共振成像技术,在一项联想学习任务中检查了pMFC的活动,在该任务中,参与者必须回忆两位数目标的空间位置,并会得到关于准确性的即时反馈。与随后被纠正的错误相比,pMFC内对于重复出现的错误的活动显著更强。此外,尽管在一个错误与同一回忆探针的下一次呈现之间有相当长的间隔(平均70秒),但回忆错误期间pMFC的活动仍能预测未来的反应(正确与错误)。海马体内的活动也能预测未来的表现,并与与错误反馈相关的pMFC活动相关。在错误的强化价值没有差异的情况下,表现期望与pMFC活动之间的关系与以下观点一致,即与错误相关的pMFC活动反映了结果“比预期更糟”的程度。

相似文献

1
Human medial frontal cortex activity predicts learning from errors.人类内侧前额叶皮质活动可预测从错误中学习的能力。
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Aug;18(8):1933-40. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm219. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
2
When goals are missed: dealing with self-generated and externally induced failure.当目标未达成时:应对自我造成的和外部导致的失败。
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.026. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
3
Learning from errors: error-related neural activity predicts improvements in future inhibitory control performance.从错误中学习:与错误相关的神经活动可预测未来抑制控制能力的提升。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 3;29(22):7158-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4337-08.2009.
4
Punishing an error improves learning: the influence of punishment magnitude on error-related neural activity and subsequent learning.惩罚错误能促进学习:惩罚力度对错误相关神经活动和后续学习的影响。
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 17;30(46):15600-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-10.2010.
5
Genetically determined differences in learning from errors.基因决定的从错误中学习的差异。
Science. 2007 Dec 7;318(5856):1642-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1145044.
6
Predictive information and error processing: the role of medial-frontal cortex during motor control.预测信息与错误处理:内侧前额叶皮质在运动控制中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):586-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00523.x. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
7
Reduced error-related activation in two anterior cingulate circuits is related to impaired performance in schizophrenia.两个前扣带回回路中与错误相关的激活减少与精神分裂症患者的表现受损有关。
Brain. 2008 Apr;131(Pt 4):971-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm307. Epub 2007 Dec 24.
8
The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control.内侧前额叶皮质在认知控制中的作用。
Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):443-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1100301.
9
Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain.人类大脑中分层错误处理的证据。
Neuroscience. 2006;137(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.064. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
10
Frontal oscillatory dynamics predict feedback learning and action adjustment.额部震荡动力学预测反馈学习和动作调整。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4106-21. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00110. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A chronometric relationship between circuits underlying learning and error monitoring in the basal ganglia and salience network.基底神经节和显著网络中学习与错误监测相关回路之间的时间计量关系。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Nov 5;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00343. eCollection 2024.
2
Error-driven upregulation of memory representations.记忆表征的错误驱动上调。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 30;3(1):17. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00199-5.
3
Negative emotion can be "more negative" for those with high metacognitive abilities when problem-solving.
在解决问题时,消极情绪对于那些元认知能力较高的人来说可能会“更消极”。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 13;14:1110211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110211. eCollection 2023.
4
Neural Mechanisms of Observational Learning: A Neural Working Model.观察性学习的神经机制:一种神经工作模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 22;14:609312. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.609312. eCollection 2020.
5
Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback-related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm.行为错误的处理过程可预测记忆形成:在联想学习范式中,与重复错误相比,纠正错误时反馈相关负波增强。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Feb;51(3):881-890. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14566. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Examining Neural Plasticity for Slip-Perturbation Training: An fMRI Study.探究用于滑倒扰动训练的神经可塑性:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 23;9:1181. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01181. eCollection 2018.
7
Cortical Power-Density Changes of Different Frequency Bands in Visually Guided Associative Learning: A Human EEG-Study.视觉引导联想学习中不同频段的皮质功率密度变化:一项人类脑电图研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 May 8;12:188. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00188. eCollection 2018.
8
Separate neural representations of prediction error valence and surprise: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis.预测误差效价和惊喜的独立神经表示:来自 fMRI 元分析的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2887-2906. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24047. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
9
Effect of Error Augmentation on Brain Activation and Motor Learning of a Complex Locomotor Task.错误增强对复杂运动任务的脑激活和运动学习的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Sep 27;11:526. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00526. eCollection 2017.
10
Learning about Expectation Violation from Prediction Error Paradigms - A Meta-Analysis on Brain Processes Following a Prediction Error.从预测误差范式中学习期望违背——对预测误差后大脑过程的元分析
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 28;8:1253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01253. eCollection 2017.