Thon Jonathan N, Schubert Peter, Duguay Marie, Serrano Katherine, Lin Shujun, Kast Juergen, Devine Dana V
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Transfusion. 2008 Mar;48(3):425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01546.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
Proteomics methods may be used to analyze changes occurring in stored blood products. These data sets can identify processes leading to storage-associated losses of blood component quality such as the platelet (PLT) storage lesion (PSL). The optimal strategy to perform such analyses to obtain the most informative data sets, including which proteomics methods, is undefined. This study addresses relative differences among proteomics approaches to the analysis of the PLT storage lesion.
Changes to the PLT proteome between Days 1 and 7 of storage were analyzed with three complementary proteomic approaches with final mass spectrometry analysis: two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis/differential gel electrophoresis (DIGE), isotope tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), and isotope-coded affinity tagging (ICAT). Observed changes in concentration during storage of selected proteins were confirmed by immunoblotting.
In total, 503 individual proteins changed concentration over a 7-day storage period. By method, a total of 93 proteins were identified by 2D gel/DIGE, 355 by iTRAQ, and 139 by ICAT. Less than 16 percent of the 503 proteins, however, were identified by not more than at least two proteomic approaches. Only 5 proteins were identified by all approaches. Membrane protein changes were not reliably detected with 2D gel/DIGE methods.
Although proteomics analyses identified many storage-associated protein changes, these varied significantly by method suggesting that a combination of protein-centric (2D gel or DIGE) and peptide-centric (iTRAQ or ICAT) approaches are essential to acquire adequate data. The use of one proteomics method to study changes in stored blood products may give insufficient information.
蛋白质组学方法可用于分析储存血液制品中发生的变化。这些数据集能够识别导致血液成分质量出现储存相关损失的过程,如血小板(PLT)储存损伤(PSL)。然而,进行此类分析以获得最具信息量的数据集的最佳策略,包括使用哪些蛋白质组学方法,目前尚不清楚。本研究探讨了蛋白质组学方法在分析血小板储存损伤方面的相对差异。
采用三种互补的蛋白质组学方法并结合最终的质谱分析,来分析储存第1天和第7天之间血小板蛋白质组的变化:二维(2D)凝胶电泳/差异凝胶电泳(DIGE)、相对和绝对定量同位素标记(iTRAQ)以及同位素编码亲和标签(ICAT)。通过免疫印迹法确认所选蛋白质在储存期间浓度的变化。
在7天的储存期内,共有503种蛋白质的浓度发生了变化。按方法统计,2D凝胶/DIGE共鉴定出93种蛋白质,iTRAQ鉴定出355种,ICAT鉴定出139种。然而,在这503种蛋白质中,只有不到16%的蛋白质通过至少两种蛋白质组学方法被鉴定出来。所有方法都鉴定出的蛋白质只有5种。2D凝胶/DIGE方法无法可靠地检测到膜蛋白的变化。
虽然蛋白质组学分析确定了许多与储存相关的蛋白质变化,但这些变化因方法而异,这表明以蛋白质为中心(2D凝胶或DIGE)和以肽为中心(iTRAQ或ICAT)的方法相结合对于获取足够的数据至关重要。使用单一的蛋白质组学方法来研究储存血液制品中的变化可能会提供不足的信息。