• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[电融合法阴道子宫切除术:96例研究]

[Vaginal hysterectomy using electrofusion: a study of 96 cases].

作者信息

Dubuisson J, Golfier F, Massoud M, Benchaib M, Bryssine B, Raudrant D

机构信息

Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, 61 quai Jules-Courmont, Lyon cedex, France.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Feb;37(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.002
PMID:18068907
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare ligature by electrofusion versus sutures in the practice of vaginal hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study on 96 patients completed over a period of 47 months. Patients were allocated into two groups: the electrofusion "suture-free" group (n=54) and the "suture" control group (n=42). Designed-end points were operating time, postoperative pain, duration of postoperative hospitalization and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

In the electrofusion group, the operating time was significantly reduced (51.3+/-22.6 min versus 67.6+/-20.1 min) as well as the reported postoperative pain (based on the visual analog scale - VAS) (1.9+/-2.0 versus 3.5+/-2.3). The average morphine consumption rate and the timing of postoperative morphine administration were lower in the electrofusion group (22.4+/-31.0mg versus 45.4+/-51.3 mg and 22.4+/-13.4 h versus 29.4+/-18.8 h, respectively). Moreover, in the electrofusion group there was less need for additional analgesics (1.9+/-2.0 versus 3.5+/-2.3) and the hospital-stay was shorter (4.2+/-1.3 days versus 5.0+/-1.0 days). There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

The use of electrofusion in vaginal hysterectomy appears to be a reliable ligation technique which reduces significantly the operating time, the postoperative pain and the length of postoperative hospitalization.

摘要

目的

比较在阴道子宫切除术中使用电融合结扎与缝合的效果。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为在47个月内完成手术的96例患者。患者被分为两组:电融合“免缝合”组(n = 54)和“缝合”对照组(n = 42)。设定的终点指标为手术时间、术后疼痛、术后住院时间和围手术期并发症。

结果

电融合组的手术时间显著缩短(51.3±22.6分钟 vs 67.6±20.1分钟),术后疼痛(基于视觉模拟评分法 - VAS)也明显减轻(1.9±2.0 vs 3.5±2.3)。电融合组的平均吗啡消耗率和术后吗啡给药时间更低(分别为22.4±31.0mg vs 45.4±51.3mg以及22.4±13.4小时 vs 29.4±18.8小时)。此外,电融合组对额外镇痛药物的需求更少(1.9±2.0 vs 3.5±2.3),住院时间更短(4.2±1.3天 vs 5.0±1.0天)。两组在围手术期并发症方面无显著差异。

结论

在阴道子宫切除术中使用电融合似乎是一种可靠的结扎技术,可显著减少手术时间、术后疼痛和术后住院时长。

相似文献

1
[Vaginal hysterectomy using electrofusion: a study of 96 cases].[电融合法阴道子宫切除术:96例研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Feb;37(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.002.
2
Bipolar coagulation with the BiClamp forceps versus conventional suture ligation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in 175 vaginal hysterectomy patients.双极电凝联合 BiClamp 抓钳与传统缝线结扎在 175 例阴道子宫切除术中的多中心随机对照研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;280(5):753-60. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1010-7. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
3
Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy.双极血管密封系统与传统缝线结扎在阴道子宫切除术中的随机对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
4
Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial.良性妇科疾病腹腔镜与经阴道子宫切除术术后疼痛:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):118.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
5
No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study.腹腔镜与经腹阴道上段子宫切除术的住院时间无差异——一项初步研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(6):682-7. doi: 10.1080/00016340600593455.
6
Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.电外科双极血管密封与传统钳夹缝合在阴道子宫切除术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1473-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03484.x. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
7
Use of Ligasure bipolar diathermy system in vaginal hysterectomy.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):49-51. doi: 10.1080/01443610400024609.
8
A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 May;90(5):837-43.
9
Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: Comparison of conventional suture ligature versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing.门诊阴道子宫切除术:传统缝线结扎与电外科双极血管封闭的比较。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 May;46(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
[Postoperative pain after hysterectomy through vaginal routes using electro surgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional suture ligature].
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):632-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.05.015. Epub 2007 Jun 22.