Maguire Ann M, Biesheuvel Cornelis J, Ambler Geoffrey R, Moore Bin, McLean Mark, Cowell Christopher T
Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008 May;68(5):683-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03100.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
The insulin tolerance test (ITT) has become less popular in paediatrics because of the risks associated with hypoglycaemia. Human corticotrophin-releasing hormone (hCRH) test results correlate with the ITT and may be an acceptable method to test for central adrenal insufficiency (CAI). Simpler tests, such as the low dose Synacthen test (LDST) and 9am cortisol, have also been proposed.
To compare the ability of the hCRH test, LDST, 9am cortisol level and 24-h cortisol profiles to diagnose CAI in a paediatric population.
A cross-sectional study in a tertiary paediatric endocrine clinic.
Thirty-one children and adolescents (aged 2.3-18.3 years) with CAI risk factors had an hCRH test, LDST, 9am cortisol and 24-h cortisol profile performed.
Of 23 patients with confirmed CAI (hCRH peak cortisol < 400 nmol/), 19 failed the LDST (peak cortisol < 267 nmol/l, i.e. 10th percentile for controls). Nineteen would have failed based on the 10th percentile cut point for 9am cortisol (< 140 nmol/l). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve coordinates, a 9am cortisol < 108 nmol/l was sensitive (83%) and specific (99%) for CAI. The 9am cortisol levels measured on two occasions were repeatable (94%) and correlated (r = 0.83, P = 0.01). All eight adrenally sufficient patients (hCRH peak cortisol > or = 400 nmol/l) passed the LDST. Seven had normal 9am cortisol (> or = 140 nmol/l). The 24-h cortisol area under the curve (AUC) for these patients was within the 10th-90th percentiles for control subjects' AUC. The peak cortisol to hCRH and LDST were correlated (r = 0.88, P = 0.01), with no difference between the peaks (mean difference -5.3 nmol/l, P = 0.69).
In children with CAI risk factors, the diagnosis can be made if unstressed 9am cortisol is < 108 nmol/l. As cortisol levels > 381 nmol/l are highly suggestive of normal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function, stimulation testing need only be performed if 9am cortisol is 108-381 nmol/l. The LDST should be interpreted cautiously because mild CAI may be missed. When stimulation results are marginal, 24-h cortisol profiles can provide reassurance of normal cortisol status.
由于存在低血糖相关风险,胰岛素耐量试验(ITT)在儿科已不太常用。人促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(hCRH)试验结果与ITT相关,可能是检测中枢性肾上腺皮质功能减退(CAI)的一种可接受方法。也有人提出了更简单的试验,如低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)试验(LDST)和上午9点皮质醇测定。
比较hCRH试验、LDST、上午9点皮质醇水平和24小时皮质醇谱在儿科人群中诊断CAI的能力。
在一家三级儿科内分泌诊所进行的横断面研究。
31名有CAI危险因素的儿童和青少年(年龄2.3 - 18.3岁)接受了hCRH试验、LDST、上午9点皮质醇测定和24小时皮质醇谱检测。
在23例确诊为CAI(hCRH刺激后皮质醇峰值<400 nmol/L)的患者中,19例LDST未通过(皮质醇峰值<267 nmol/L,即对照组第10百分位数)。根据上午9点皮质醇第10百分位数切点(<140 nmol/L),19例也会判定为未通过。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线坐标,上午9点皮质醇<108 nmol/L对CAI的敏感性为83%,特异性为99%。两次测量的上午9点皮质醇水平具有可重复性(94%)且呈相关性(r = 0.83,P = 0.01)。所有8例肾上腺功能正常的患者(hCRH刺激后皮质醇峰值≥400 nmol/L)LDST均通过。7例上午9点皮质醇正常(≥140 nmol/L)。这些患者的24小时皮质醇曲线下面积(AUC)在对照组AUC的第10 - 90百分位数范围内。hCRH刺激后皮质醇峰值与LDST刺激后皮质醇峰值相关(r = 0.88,P = 0.01),峰值之间无差异(平均差异 - 5.3 nmol/L,P = 0.69)。
对于有CAI危险因素的儿童,如果上午9点静息状态下皮质醇<108 nmol/L即可作出诊断。由于皮质醇水平>381 nmol/L高度提示下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)功能正常,仅当上午9点皮质醇为108 - 381 nmol/L时才需进行刺激试验。LDST的解读应谨慎,因为可能会漏诊轻度CAI。当刺激试验结果处于临界值时,24小时皮质醇谱可确定皮质醇状态正常。