Shin Sung Jae, Collins Michael T
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1102, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Feb;52(2):418-26. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00678-07. Epub 2007 Dec 10.
The in vitro susceptibility of human- and bovine-origin Mycobacterium paratuberculosis to the thioupurine drugs 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathioprine (AZA) was established using conventional plate counting methods and the MGIT 960 ParaTB culture system. Both 6-MP and AZA had antibacterial activity against M. paratuberculosis; isolates from Crohn's disease patients tended to be more susceptible than were bovine-origin isolates. Isolates of Mycobacterium avium, used as controls, were generally resistant to both AZA and 6-MP, even at high concentrations (> or =64.0 microg/ml). Among rapidly growing mycobacteria, Mycobacterium phlei was susceptible to 6-MP and AZA whereas Mycobacterium smegmatis strains were not. AZA and 6-MP limited the growth of, but did not kill, M. paratuberculosis in a dose-dependent manner. Anti-inflammatory drugs in the sulfonamide family (sulfapyridine, sulfasalazine, and 5-aminosalycilic acid [mesalamine]) had little or no antibacterial activity against M. paratuberculosis. The conventional antibiotics azithromycin and ciprofloxacin, used as control drugs, were bactericidal for M. paratuberculosis, exerting their killing effects on the organism relatively quickly. Simultaneous exposure of M. paratuberculosis to 6-MP and ciprofloxacin resulted in significantly higher CFU than use of ciprofloxacin alone. These data may partially explain the paradoxical response of Crohn's disease patients infected with M. paratuberculosis to treatment with immunosuppressive thiopurine drugs, i.e., they do not worsen with anti-inflammatory treatment as would be expected with a microbiological etiologic pathogen. These findings also should influence the design of therapeutic trials to evaluate antibiotic treatments of Crohn's disease: AZA drugs may confound interpretation of data on therapeutic responses for both antibiotic-treated and control groups.
采用传统平板计数法和MGIT 960副结核分枝杆菌培养系统,确定了人源和牛源副结核分枝杆菌对硫嘌呤类药物6-巯基嘌呤(6-MP)和硫唑嘌呤(AZA)的体外敏感性。6-MP和AZA对副结核分枝杆菌均具有抗菌活性;克罗恩病患者的分离株往往比牛源分离株更敏感。用作对照的鸟分枝杆菌分离株通常对AZA和6-MP均耐药,即使在高浓度(≥64.0μg/ml)时也是如此。在快速生长的分枝杆菌中,草分枝杆菌对6-MP和AZA敏感,而耻垢分枝杆菌菌株则不敏感。AZA和6-MP以剂量依赖的方式限制了副结核分枝杆菌的生长,但未将其杀死。磺胺类抗炎药(磺胺吡啶、柳氮磺胺吡啶和5-氨基水杨酸[美沙拉嗪])对副结核分枝杆菌几乎没有或没有抗菌活性。用作对照药物的传统抗生素阿奇霉素和环丙沙星对副结核分枝杆菌具有杀菌作用,对该菌的杀灭作用相对较快。副结核分枝杆菌同时暴露于6-MP和环丙沙星时,其菌落形成单位(CFU)显著高于单独使用环丙沙星时。这些数据可能部分解释了感染副结核分枝杆菌的克罗恩病患者对免疫抑制硫嘌呤类药物治疗出现矛盾反应的原因,即他们不会像微生物病原体引发的炎症那样因抗炎治疗而恶化。这些发现也应影响评估克罗恩病抗生素治疗的临床试验设计:AZA药物可能会混淆抗生素治疗组和对照组治疗反应数据的解释。