• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典高危骨质疏松、高血压和高脂血症女性患者治疗的成本效益分析

The cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden.

作者信息

Zethraeus N, Ström O, Borgström F, Kanis J A, Jönsson B

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, S-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jun;19(6):819-27. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0511-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-007-0511-0
PMID:18071650
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This paper assessed the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden, using one model and a societal perspective. Cost-effective scenarios were found in all these chronic disorders. These findings are of relevance for decisions on the efficient allocation of health care resources.

INTRODUCTION

There is a need to assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of treatment of osteoporosis from a societal perspective and to relate this to the CE of interventions in other disease areas. This is of relevance for decisions on the efficient allocation of health care resources within and between disease areas. The purpose of the paper was to estimate the CE of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and to put that into the perspective of treating hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. The CE was assessed for different high risk female populations aged 50-80 years.

METHODS

The estimation of CE was based on a model populated with data for Sweden.

RESULTS

Compared to no intervention, a 5-year treatment of osteoporosis, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia, is cost effective for most of the assessed high risk female populations. The cost per gained quality adjusted life year (QALY) for the treatment of a 70-year-old woman never exceeded SEK 330,000 (US$ 44,000), which is generally judged as an acceptable cost for a gained QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that it is possible to produce reliable estimates of the CE of treatments in different disease areas within the context of a single model.

摘要

未标注

本文采用单一模型并从社会角度评估了瑞典高危骨质疏松、高血压和高脂血症女性的治疗成本效益。在所有这些慢性疾病中都发现了具有成本效益的方案。这些发现对于有效分配卫生保健资源的决策具有重要意义。

引言

有必要从社会角度评估骨质疏松症治疗的成本效益,并将其与其他疾病领域干预措施的成本效益相关联。这对于疾病领域内和疾病领域之间有效分配卫生保健资源的决策具有重要意义。本文的目的是估计骨质疏松症治疗和预防的成本效益,并将其置于治疗高血压和高脂血症的背景下进行考量。对50至80岁不同高危女性人群的成本效益进行了评估。

方法

成本效益的估计基于一个用瑞典数据填充的模型。

结果

与不进行干预相比,对大多数评估的高危女性人群而言,对骨质疏松症、高血压和高脂血症进行5年治疗具有成本效益。治疗一名70岁女性每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本从未超过330,000瑞典克朗(44,000美元),这通常被认为是获得一个QALY可接受的成本。

结论

该研究表明,在单一模型的背景下,可以对不同疾病领域治疗的成本效益进行可靠估计。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden.瑞典高危骨质疏松、高血压和高脂血症女性患者治疗的成本效益分析
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jun;19(6):819-27. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0511-0.
2
Cost-effectiveness of gastro-resistant risedronate tablets for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France.法国用于治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的雷奈酸锶片的成本效益分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):649-658. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-04821-7. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Cost-effectiveness of implementing guidelines for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japan.在日本实施糖皮质激素性骨质疏松症治疗指南的成本效益分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Feb;30(2):299-310. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4798-9. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of osteoporosis screening and treatment strategy for postmenopausal Japanese women.基于模型的绝经后日本女性骨质疏松症筛查和治疗策略的成本效益分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Feb;28(2):643-652. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3782-5. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.阿仑膦酸盐、依替膦酸盐、利塞膦酸盐、雷洛昔芬和特立帕肽用于预防和治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jun;9(22):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta9220.
6
An economic evaluation of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporosis in a Swedish setting: based on the results of the SOTI and TROPOS trials.瑞典环境下雷奈酸锶治疗骨质疏松症的经济学评估:基于SOTI和TROPOS试验结果
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1781-93. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0193-z. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
7
Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.日本老年骨质疏松女性使用地诺单抗与口服阿仑膦酸钠的成本效益
Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1733-1744. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3940-4. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries--an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial.阿仑膦酸钠治疗9个欧洲国家绝经后妇女的成本效益——基于骨折干预试验的经济学评估
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1047-61. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0349-5. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan.唑来膦酸注射液治疗骨质疏松症的成本效果分析在日本。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jun;28(6):1939-1950. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3973-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland.瑞士基于人群筛查使用阿仑膦酸盐的模拟成本效用分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Nov;18(11):1481-91. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0390-4. Epub 2007 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A brief history of FRAX.FRAX 的简史。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Oct 31;13(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0510-0.
2
Direct healthcare costs for 5 years post-fracture in Canada: a long-term population-based assessment.加拿大骨折后 5 年的直接医疗成本:一项长期的基于人群的评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 May;24(5):1697-705. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2232-2. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Safety, effectiveness and predictors for early reoperation in therapeutic and prophylactic vertebroplasty: short-term results of a prospective case series of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries--an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial.阿仑膦酸钠治疗9个欧洲国家绝经后妇女的成本效益——基于骨折干预试验的经济学评估
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1047-61. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0349-5. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
2
Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial.治疗5年后继续或停用阿仑膦酸盐的效果:骨折干预试验长期扩展研究(FLEX):一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 27;296(24):2927-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.24.2927.
3
治疗性和预防性椎体成形术中早期再次手术的安全性、有效性及预测因素:骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者前瞻性病例系列的短期结果
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S792-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1989-x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
4
Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.《2011年女性心血管疾病预防基于有效性的指南更新:美国心脏协会指南》
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 22;57(12):1404-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.005.
5
Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association.基于有效性的女性心血管疾病预防指南——2011年更新版:美国心脏协会指南
Circulation. 2011 Mar 22;123(11):1243-62. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
6
Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty: Early results of a prospective one-year case series of osteoporosis patients in an academic high-volume center.椎体成形术的安全性和有效性:学术性大容量中心骨质疏松症患者前瞻性一年病例系列的早期结果。
Indian J Orthop. 2009 Jul;43(3):228-33. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.53452.
7
[Current diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis on the basis of "European guidance 2008"].基于《2008年欧洲指南》的骨质疏松症当前诊断与治疗
Orthopade. 2009 Apr;38(4):365-79; quiz 380. doi: 10.1007/s00132-008-1404-4.
8
[Treatment of osteoporosis according to the "European Guidance 2008". Fracture-oriented--economical--cost-effective].[依据《2008年欧洲指南》治疗骨质疏松症。以骨折为导向——经济——性价比高]
Internist (Berl). 2008 Sep;49(9):1126-36. doi: 10.1007/s00108-008-2192-y.
9
NICE continues to muddy the waters of osteoporosis.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)继续搅浑骨质疏松症这潭水。
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Aug;19(8):1105-7. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0649-4. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
10
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.欧洲绝经后女性骨质疏松症诊断与管理指南。
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):399-428. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0560-z. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis--a review of the literature and a reference model.
骨质疏松症治疗与预防的成本效益——文献综述及参考模型
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Jan;18(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0257-0. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
4
The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis: an international perspective.利塞膦酸盐治疗骨质疏松症的成本效益:国际视角
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(7):996-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0094-1. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
5
Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden.瑞典与骨质疏松性骨折相关的成本和生活质量
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-0015-8. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
6
Reassessment of the cost-effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy in Sweden: results based on the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.瑞典激素替代疗法成本效益的重新评估:基于女性健康倡议随机对照试验的结果
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Fall;21(4):433-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462305050609.
7
Economic evaluations of interventions for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a structured review of the literature.骨质疏松症预防和治疗干预措施的经济学评估:文献的结构化综述
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan;17(1):29-40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1943-z. Epub 2005 Jun 25.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.阿仑膦酸盐、依替膦酸盐、利塞膦酸盐、雷洛昔芬和特立帕肽用于预防和治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jun;9(22):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta9220.
9
Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. 1995.普伐他汀对高胆固醇血症男性冠心病的预防作用。1995年。
Atheroscler Suppl. 2004 Oct;5(3):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2004.08.029.
10
A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk.既往骨折与后续骨折风险的荟萃分析。
Bone. 2004 Aug;35(2):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024.