• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁美洲的姑息性镇静:实践与态度调查

Palliative sedation in Latin America: survey on practices and attitudes.

作者信息

Moyano Jairo, Zambrano Sofia, Ceballos César, Santacruz Carlos Miguel, Guerrero Carlos

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, SA, Colombia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2008 May;16(5):431-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0361-5. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-007-0361-5
PMID:18071763
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Palliative sedation (PS) is the subject of ethical and legal debates worldwide. Statistics of its utilization are available in developed countries; however, in Latin America, these data are scarcely known. The purpose of this research was to determine the practices and attitudes of palliativists in Latin America towards PS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected during the Latin American Congress on Palliative Care in Isla Margarita, Venezuela. A total of 89 professionals participated in this survey.

RESULTS

It was found that the use of PS was positively associated with being a physician and being members of a palliative care (PC) group. On the other hand, it was found that being a psychologist and identifying barriers toward PS limited its utilization.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study support the need to establish clinical guidelines for its utilization and to educate other specialists on end-of-life care approaches, and the need to develop PC programs in acute care hospitals in Latin America.

摘要

引言

姑息性镇静(PS)是全球范围内伦理和法律辩论的主题。发达国家有其使用情况的统计数据;然而,在拉丁美洲,这些数据鲜为人知。本研究的目的是确定拉丁美洲姑息治疗专家对PS的实践和态度。

材料与方法

数据收集于委内瑞拉玛格丽塔岛举行的拉丁美洲姑息治疗大会期间。共有89名专业人员参与了这项调查。

结果

发现PS的使用与身为医生以及属于姑息治疗(PC)团队呈正相关。另一方面,发现身为心理学家以及认识到PS存在的障碍限制了其使用。

讨论

本研究结果支持有必要制定其使用的临床指南,并就临终关怀方法对其他专科医生进行培训,以及在拉丁美洲的急症医院开展PC项目。

相似文献

1
Palliative sedation in Latin America: survey on practices and attitudes.拉丁美洲的姑息性镇静:实践与态度调查
Support Care Cancer. 2008 May;16(5):431-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0361-5. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
2
French Swiss physicians' attitude toward palliative sedation: Influence of prognosis and type of suffering.法国和瑞士医生对姑息性镇静的态度:预后和痛苦类型的影响。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Oct;12(5):345-50. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000278. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
3
Having a difficult time leaving: experiences and attitudes of nurses with palliative sedation.难以离开:实施姑息性镇静的护士的经历与态度
Palliat Med. 2007 Oct;21(7):643-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216307081186.
4
The complexity of nurses' attitudes and practice of sedation at the end of life: a systematic literature review.临终时护士镇静态度与实践的复杂性:一项系统文献综述
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May;47(5):915-925.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
5
Opinions of the Dutch public on palliative sedation: a mixed-methods approach.荷兰公众对姑息性镇静的看法:混合方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Oct;63(615):e676-82. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X673685.
6
Continuous Palliative Sedation for Existential Distress? A Survey of Canadian Palliative Care Physicians' Views.针对存在性痛苦的持续姑息性镇静?一项关于加拿大姑息治疗医生观点的调查。
J Palliat Care. 2017 Jan;32(1):26-33. doi: 10.1177/0825859717711301.
7
A systematic literature review on the ethics of palliative sedation: an update (2016).姑息性镇静的伦理学系统文献综述:更新(2016年)
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2016 Sep;10(3):201-7. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000224.
8
Attitudes of Quebec doctors toward sedation at the end of life: an exploratory study.魁北克医生对临终镇静的态度:一项探索性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep;7(3):331-7. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990265.
9
Attitudes of palliative home care physicians towards palliative sedation at home in Italy.意大利姑息性居家护理医生对在家中实施姑息性镇静的态度。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 May;25(5):1615-1620. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3581-3. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Palliative sedation therapy.姑息性镇静治疗
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2009 Apr;70(4):208-11. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2009.70.4.41623.

引用本文的文献

1
Consultation with specialist palliative care services in palliative sedation: considerations of Dutch physicians.在姑息性镇静治疗中咨询专科姑息治疗服务:荷兰医生的考虑。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jan;22(1):225-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1972-7. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
2
[Sedation in palliative medicine: Guidelines for the use of sedation in palliative care : European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)].[姑息医学中的镇静:姑息治疗中镇静使用指南:欧洲姑息治疗协会(EAPC)]
Schmerz. 2010 Aug;24(4):342-54. doi: 10.1007/s00482-010-0948-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical validity of palliative sedation therapy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted on specialized palliative care units in Japan.姑息性镇静治疗的伦理有效性:一项在日本专科姑息治疗病房开展的多中心、前瞻性观察性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct;30(4):308-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.016.
2
End of life: the humanist view.
Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1235-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67486-7.
3
End-of-life: a catholic view.
Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1132-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67425-9.
4
End-of-life: the traditional Christian view.临终:传统基督教观点。
Lancet. 2005;366(9490):1045-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67383-7.
5
End of life: the Buddhist view.生命的终结:佛教观点。
Lancet. 2005;366(9489):952-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67323-0.
6
End-of-life: the Islamic view.临终关怀:伊斯兰教观点。
Lancet. 2005;366(9487):774-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67183-8.
7
End-of-life: a Hindu view.临终关怀:印度教视角。
Lancet. 2005;366(9486):682-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67141-3.
8
Controlled sedation for physical and existential suffering?
J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):144-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.144.
9
Sedation for terminally ill patients with cancer with uncontrollable physical distress.为患有无法控制的身体疼痛的晚期癌症患者实施镇静治疗。
J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):20-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.20.
10
Palliative sedation to relieve psycho-existential suffering of terminally ill cancer patients.姑息性镇静以缓解晚期癌症患者的心理-生存痛苦。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Nov;28(5):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.02.017.