Nakayama T, Kudo H, Sakamoto S, Tanaka A, Mano Y
Department of Health Education, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2008 Apr;116(4):193-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993146. Epub 2007 Dec 10.
Skin punctures at alternative sites can reduce the pain associated with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). However, delays in detection of blood glucose at alternative sites during rapid systemic blood glucose change have been reported. Accordingly, we developed a novel method of finger pricking and tested it to see if it would both reduce or eliminate pain and accurately reflect systemic glucose levels, even during rapid changes.
Each of 35 healthy volunteers (10 females and 25 males; mean age 36.6 years, range 18-82 years) received 5 serial punctures from a lancet device on randomly selected fingers. The puncture target was the dorsal side of the finger between the nail and the distal finger joint. We used a lancet device designed for accurate punctures of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mm depths. Immediately afterward, as a control, a conventional fingertip puncture was done on the front of a 6th finger. After each puncture, subjects were asked whether or not they felt pain.
Following punctures at depths of 0.2 mm and 0.3 mm, respectively, 31 of 35 subjects (89%) and 33 of 35 subjects (94%) felt no pain. Following conventional punctures, all 35 subjects (100%) felt pain. Blood sample volumes> or =2microL were obtained in all cases except for two punctures at 0.2 mm depth. Blood glucose levels did not differ with differing puncture sites, (conventional fingertip sites vs. alternative sites used in this study).
Our findings demonstrate that 0.2 and 0.3 mm punctures at our alternative finger site - the dorsal side of the finger between the nail and the distal finger joint - can provide blood samples sufficient for SMBG, substantially redu-ces the proportion of subjects who experience pain, and accurately reflects systemic glucose levels.
在其他部位进行皮肤穿刺可减轻与自我血糖监测(SMBG)相关的疼痛。然而,有报道称在全身血糖快速变化期间,在其他部位检测血糖会出现延迟。因此,我们开发了一种新型的手指采血方法并进行测试,以观察其是否既能减轻或消除疼痛,又能准确反映全身血糖水平,即使在快速变化期间也是如此。
35名健康志愿者(10名女性和25名男性;平均年龄36.6岁,范围18 - 82岁)每人从采血针装置在随机选择的手指上接受5次连续穿刺。穿刺目标是指甲与手指远端关节之间手指的背侧。我们使用了一种设计用于精确穿刺0.2、0.3、0.4、0.5和0.6毫米深度的采血针装置。随后,作为对照,在第6根手指的正面进行一次传统的指尖穿刺。每次穿刺后,询问受试者是否感到疼痛。
分别在0.2毫米和0.3毫米深度穿刺后,35名受试者中有31名(89%)和35名受试者中有33名(94%)未感到疼痛。在进行传统穿刺后,所有35名受试者(100%)都感到疼痛。除了两次0.2毫米深度的穿刺外,所有情况下均获得了≥2微升的血样体积。不同穿刺部位(传统指尖部位与本研究中使用的其他部位)的血糖水平没有差异。
我们的研究结果表明,在我们选择的其他手指部位——指甲与手指远端关节之间手指的背侧——进行0.2毫米和0.3毫米的穿刺,可以提供足以进行自我血糖监测的血样,大幅降低感到疼痛的受试者比例,并准确反映全身血糖水平。