Suppr超能文献

评估 OneTouch® Delica™:一种用于自我监测血糖的低痛刺血系统。

Evaluating the OneTouch® Delica™: a low-pain lancing system for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

机构信息

Diabetes Technology Consultants, Wyckoff, NJ 07481, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 2011 Jul;123(4):92-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.07.2308.

Abstract

The pain associated with lancing can be a significant barrier to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). The OneTouch® Delica™ lancing device contains features to reduce lancing pain, including improved lancet control and stability, reduced vibration, and a thinner, 33-gauge lancet. This 2-visit, randomized controlled trial assessed perceived pain of lancing with the OneTouch® Delica™ compared with 4 other common lancing devices: OneTouch® Comfort™, ACCU-CHEK® Softclix, ACCU-CHEK® Multiclix, and Ascensia® Microlet™2. Two hundred patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus were assigned to the OneTouch® Delica™ and also randomized to 1 of the 4 comparator devices (n=50 per device pair). At visit 1, we determined the minimum depth settings required to produce≥1 μL of fingertip blood for each patient with each device. At visit 2, patients lanced their fingertips with the devices at the predetermined depths and used a 150-mm visual analog scale (VAS) to rate lancing pain relative to their "usual pain" associated with SMBG. The VAS ranged from "much less painful" (0 mm) to "much more painful" (150 mm), with the midpoint (75 mm) labeled as "usual pain." Fingertip pain scores from patients using OneTouch® Delica™ were significantly lower than those obtained using OneTouch® Comfort™, ACCU-CHEK® Multiclix, and Ascensia® Microlet™2. Pain scores for OneTouch® Delica™ and ACCU-CHEK® Softclix were not significantly different. In conclusion, OneTouch® Delica™ was either less painful or no different than the comparator devices when used for fingertip lancing. Innovative lancing devices that cause less pain may improve compliance and persistence with prescribed SMBG.

摘要

刺破相关的疼痛可能是自我监测血糖(SMBG)的一个重大障碍。OneTouch®Delica™ 采血针具有减轻刺痛感的功能,包括改进的采血针控制和稳定性、减少振动以及更薄的 33 号采血针。这项 2 次就诊、随机对照试验评估了与其他 4 种常见采血器相比,OneTouch®Delica™ 的刺破疼痛感知:OneTouch®Comfort™、ACCU-CHEK®Softclix、ACCU-CHEK®Multiclix 和 Ascensia®Microlet™2。200 名 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者被分配到 OneTouch®Delica™,并随机分配到 4 种比较器设备中的 1 种(每对设备 50 名患者)。在就诊 1 时,我们确定了每位患者使用每种设备产生≥1 μL 指尖血所需的最小深度设置。在就诊 2 时,患者使用设备以预定深度刺破指尖,并使用 150 毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)相对于他们与 SMBG 相关的“常规疼痛”来评估刺破疼痛。VAS 范围从“明显不疼”(0 毫米)到“明显更疼”(150 毫米),中点(75 毫米)标记为“常规疼痛”。使用 OneTouch®Delica™ 的患者的指尖疼痛评分明显低于使用 OneTouch®Comfort™、ACCU-CHEK®Multiclix 和 Ascensia®Microlet™2 的患者。OneTouch®Delica™ 和 ACCU-CHEK®Softclix 的疼痛评分无显著差异。总之,与比较器设备相比,当用于指尖刺破时,OneTouch®Delica™ 要么更不痛,要么无差异。引起疼痛较小的创新刺破装置可能会提高对规定 SMBG 的依从性和持久性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验