Greer Peter B, Vial Philip, Oliver Lyn, Baldock Clive
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4389-98. doi: 10.1118/1.2789406.
The aim of this work was to experimentally determine the difference in response of an amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to the open and multileaf collimator (MLC) transmitted beam components of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beams. EPID dose response curves were measured for open and MLC transmitted (MLCtr) 10 x 10 cm2 beams at central axis and with off axis distance using a shifting field technique. The EPID signal was obtained by replacing the flood-field correction with a pixel sensitivity variation matrix correction. This signal, which includes energy-dependent response, was then compared to ion-chamber measurements. An EPID calibration method to remove the effect of beam energy variations on EPID response was developed for IMRT beams. This method uses the component of open and MLCtr fluence to an EPID pixel calculated from the MLC delivery file and applies separate radially dependent calibration factors for each component. The calibration procedure does not correct for scatter differences between ion chamber in water measurements and EPID response; these must be accounted for separately with a kernel-based approach or similar method. The EPID response at central axis for the open beam was found to be 1.28 +/- 0.03 of the response for the MLCtr beam, with the ratio increasing to 1.39 at 12.5 cm off axis. The EPID response to MLCtr radiation did not change with off-axis distance. Filtering the beam with copper plates to reduce the beam energy difference between open and MLCtr beams was investigated; however, these were not effective at reducing EPID response differences. The change in EPID response for uniform sliding window IMRT beams with MLCtr dose components from 0.3% to 69% was predicted to within 2.3% using the separate EPID response calibration factors for each dose component. A clinical IMRT image calibrated with this method differed by nearly 30% in high MLCtr regions from an image calibrated with an open beam calibration factor only. Accounting for the difference in EPID response to open and MLCtr radiation should improve IMRT dosimetry with a-Si EPIDs.
本研究的目的是通过实验确定非晶硅(a-Si)电子射野影像装置(EPID)对调强放射治疗(IMRT)射束的开放野和多叶准直器(MLC)透射射束成分的响应差异。使用移动野技术在中心轴和离轴距离处测量开放野和MLC透射(MLCtr)10×10 cm2射束的EPID剂量响应曲线。通过用像素灵敏度变化矩阵校正代替泛射野校正来获得EPID信号。然后将该包含能量依赖响应的信号与电离室测量结果进行比较。针对IMRT射束,开发了一种消除射束能量变化对EPID响应影响的EPID校准方法。该方法使用根据MLC传输文件计算得出的开放野和MLCtr注量对EPID像素的成分,并对每个成分应用单独的径向相关校准因子。校准程序未校正水中电离室测量与EPID响应之间的散射差异;这些差异必须用基于核的方法或类似方法单独考虑。发现开放野在中心轴处的EPID响应是MLCtr射束响应的1.28±0.03倍,在离轴12.5 cm处该比值增加到1.39。EPID对MLCtr辐射的响应不随离轴距离变化。研究了用铜板过滤射束以减小开放野和MLCtr射束之间的射束能量差异;然而,这些方法在减小EPID响应差异方面无效。使用每个剂量成分单独的EPID响应校准因子,预测均匀滑动窗口IMRT射束中MLCtr剂量成分从0.3%到69%时EPID响应的变化在2.3%以内。用此方法校准的临床IMRT图像在高MLCtr区域与仅用开放野校准因子校准的图像相差近30%。考虑EPID对开放野和MLCtr辐射响应的差异应能改善使用a-Si EPID的IMRT剂量测定。