Reid C M, Gooberman-Hill R, Hanks G W
Gloucestershire Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
Ann Oncol. 2008 Jan;19(1):44-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm462. Epub 2007 Dec 10.
Morphine and other opioids are the mainstay of cancer pain management, yet considerable fears surrounding them present barriers to pain control. Research in groups already using opioids has examined their concerns, but there is little evidence about how patients react when first offered opioids. We explored the factors influencing the decision to accept or reject morphine when first offered to patients with cancer.
A qualitative in-depth interview study nested within a cancer pain management trial. Interviews were conducted with 18 patients (nine females), aged 42-88 years.
The categories that surrounded decisions about commencement of opioids were: anticipation of death; morphine as a last resort; the role of the professional; and 'no choice' but to commence. Participants rejected morphine as a medical intervention to control pain and promote quality of life because they saw it only as a comfort measure for the dying. However, opioids were more acceptable if health care providers had confidence in opioids and side-effects were well managed.
Among cancer patients the idea that opioids represent a comfort measure for the dying and not legitimate analgesics may represent a greater barrier to their uptake than concerns about tolerance or addiction.
吗啡及其他阿片类药物是癌症疼痛管理的主要手段,但围绕这些药物的诸多担忧成为了疼痛控制的障碍。针对已经在使用阿片类药物的群体开展的研究调查了他们的担忧,但关于患者首次使用阿片类药物时的反应,几乎没有相关证据。我们探究了影响首次向癌症患者提供吗啡时,患者接受或拒绝决定的因素。
一项定性深入访谈研究嵌套于一项癌症疼痛管理试验中。对18名年龄在42 - 88岁之间的患者(9名女性)进行了访谈。
围绕阿片类药物起始使用决策的类别包括:对死亡的预期;吗啡作为最后手段;专业人员的作用;以及开始使用是“别无选择”。参与者拒绝将吗啡作为控制疼痛和提高生活质量的医疗干预措施,因为他们认为吗啡只是临终时的一种安慰措施。然而,如果医疗保健提供者对阿片类药物有信心且副作用得到妥善管理,那么阿片类药物会更容易被接受。
在癌症患者中,认为阿片类药物是临终安慰措施而非合理镇痛药的观念,可能比担心耐受性或成瘾性对其使用构成更大障碍。