Kim Young-Ju, Xiao Yan, Mackenzie Colin F, Gardner Sharyn D
Program in Trauma and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):676-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000236056.38623.5b.
Despite American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma's criteria, little data exists about the variability of practices in both the composition of trauma teams and timing of specialist availability across trauma centers. The purpose of the study was to determine the availability of trauma team personnel in Level I and II trauma centers across the United States.
Two surveys were developed and mailed to trauma directors and coordinators in 450 centers. Responses were received from 254 directors (56%) and 218 coordinators (48%). The director survey was designed to collect data on trauma team composition and timeliness in response to a hypothetical scenario. The coordinator survey was designed to collect data on trauma center characteristics and general availability of trauma specialists.
Eighty-two percent of Level I and II centers had trauma surgeons available within 15 minutes of and 37% at patient admission. The in-house (IH) centers (60%) had a trauma surgeon at patient admission significantly more than on-call centers did (22%). The specialty surgeons, such as neurosurgeons (73%) and orthopedic surgeons (75%), were mostly available through the on-call system. An IH system, high volumes of trauma patients, and designation by American College of Surgeons were significantly associated with higher likelihood of trauma surgeons physically present at the bedside within 15 minutes.
There was a large variation in the availability of expertise at or shortly after a trauma admission. For centers with low patient volume, early triage, better notification systems based on advanced telecommunication technology, and compensation for IH call may be a solution to better use the trauma surgical specialties.
尽管美国外科医师学会创伤委员会制定了相关标准,但关于创伤中心创伤团队组成和专科医生到位时间的实践差异的数据却很少。本研究的目的是确定美国一级和二级创伤中心创伤团队人员的到位情况。
设计了两份调查问卷并邮寄给450个中心的创伤科主任和协调员。收到了254位主任(56%)和218位协调员(48%)的回复。主任调查问卷旨在收集关于创伤团队组成以及对一个假设情景的响应及时性的数据。协调员调查问卷旨在收集关于创伤中心特征和创伤专科医生总体到位情况的数据。
82%的一级和二级中心在患者入院后15分钟内有创伤外科医生可供调配,37%的中心在患者入院时就有创伤外科医生。内部(IH)中心(60%)在患者入院时配备创伤外科医生的比例显著高于随叫随到中心(22%)。专科外科医生,如神经外科医生(73%)和骨科医生(75%),大多通过随叫随到系统可供调配。内部系统、大量创伤患者以及被美国外科医师学会指定与创伤外科医生在15分钟内实际到达床边的可能性更高显著相关。
创伤入院时或入院后不久,专业人员的到位情况存在很大差异。对于患者数量少的中心,早期分诊、基于先进电信技术的更好通知系统以及对内部值班的补偿可能是更好利用创伤外科专科资源的解决方案。