• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤中心的通信技术:一项全国性调查。

Communication technology in trauma centers: a national survey.

作者信息

Xiao Yan, Kim Young-Ju, Gardner Sharyn D, Faraj Samer, MacKenzie Colin F

机构信息

Program in Trauma, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.014
PMID:16434331
Abstract

The relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and trauma work coordination has long been recognized. The purpose of the study was to investigate the type and frequency of use of various ICTs to activate and organize trauma teams in level I/II trauma centers. In a cross-sectional survey, questionnaires were mailed to trauma directors and clinicians in 457 trauma centers in the United States. Responses were received from 254 directors and 767 clinicians. Communication with pre-hospital care providers was conducted predominantly via shortwave radio (67.3%). The primary communication methods used to reach trauma surgeons were manual (56.7%) and computerized group page (36.6%). Computerized group page (53.7%) and regular telephone (49.8%) were cited as the most advantageous devices; e-mail (52.3%) and dry erase whiteboard (52.1%) were selected as the least advantageous. Attending surgeons preferred less overhead paging and more cellular phone communication than did emergency medicine physicians and nurses. Cellular phones have become an important part of hospital-field communication. In high-volume trauma centers, there is a need for more accurate methods of communicating with field personnel and among hospital care providers.

摘要

信息通信技术(ICT)与创伤救治工作协调之间的关系早已得到认可。本研究的目的是调查各类信息通信技术在一级/二级创伤中心启动和组织创伤团队时的使用类型和频率。在一项横断面调查中,向美国457家创伤中心的创伤主任和临床医生邮寄了问卷。收到了254位主任和767位临床医生的回复。与院前护理人员的沟通主要通过短波无线电进行(67.3%)。联系创伤外科医生的主要沟通方式是人工方式(56.7%)和电脑群发寻呼(36.6%)。电脑群发寻呼(53.7%)和普通电话(49.8%)被认为是最具优势的设备;电子邮件(52.3%)和擦写白板(52.1%)被选为最不具优势的设备。与急诊医学医生和护士相比,主治外科医生更喜欢减少头顶式寻呼,增加手机通信。手机已成为医院与现场通信的重要组成部分。在高流量创伤中心,需要更准确的与现场人员及医院护理人员之间的通信方法。

相似文献

1
Communication technology in trauma centers: a national survey.创伤中心的通信技术:一项全国性调查。
J Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.014.
2
Availability of trauma specialists in level I and II trauma centers: a national survey.一级和二级创伤中心创伤专科医生的可及性:一项全国性调查。
J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):676-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000236056.38623.5b.
3
What whiteboards in a trauma center operating suite can teach us about emergency department communication.创伤中心手术室的白板能让我们了解到关于急诊科沟通的哪些内容。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;50(4):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.027. Epub 2007 May 11.
4
Facial trauma coverage among level-1 trauma centers of the United States.美国一级创伤中心的面部创伤治疗范围
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):963-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.020.
5
The U.S. trauma surgeon's current scope of practice: can we deliver acute care surgery?美国创伤外科医生当前的执业范围:我们能否提供急性护理手术?
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):955-65; discussion 965-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181692148.
6
Handling of outside trauma studies: a survey of program directors.外部创伤研究的处理:项目主任调查
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 May;5(5):657-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.11.004.
7
Trauma and surgical critical care workforce in the United States: a severe surgeon shortage appears imminent.美国创伤与外科重症监护医护人员队伍:严重的外科医生短缺似乎即将出现。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Oct;209(4):446-452.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.06.369. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
8
Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?创伤中心有能力应对灾难吗?
J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):949-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a.
9
Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: pilot study using the Communication Assessment Tool-Team (CAT-T).患者对与医疗团队沟通的看法:使用团队沟通评估工具(CAT-T)的试点研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):220-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.003.
10
The on-call crisis: a statewide assessment of the costs of providing on-call specialist coverage.随叫随到危机:对提供随叫随到专科服务成本的全州范围评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):727-33, 733.e1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.017. Epub 2007 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluative Research of Technologies for Prehospital Communication and Coordination: a Systematic Review.院前通讯与协调技术的评价性研究:系统综述。
J Med Syst. 2020 Apr 3;44(5):100. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01556-z.
2
Sketching Awareness: A Participatory Study to Elicit Designs for Supporting Emergency Medical Teamwork.勾勒意识:一项旨在引出支持紧急医疗团队合作设计的参与式研究。
Comput Support Coop Work. 2015 Feb 1;24(1):1-38. doi: 10.1007/s10606-014-9210-5.
3
Emergency pages using a computer-based anesthesiology paging system in ambulatory surgical centers: a retrospective review.
门诊手术中心使用基于计算机的麻醉学传呼系统的紧急传呼:一项回顾性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jul;119(1):145-150. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000264.
4
Supporting information use and retention of pre-hospital information during trauma resuscitation: a qualitative study of pre-hospital communications and information needs.创伤复苏期间院前信息的辅助信息使用与留存:一项关于院前沟通及信息需求的定性研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:1579-88. eCollection 2013.
5
The composition of surgical teams in the operating room and its impact on surgical team performance in China.中国手术室外科团队的组成及其对外科团队绩效的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1473-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3318-4. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
6
Characteristics of emergency pages using a computer-based anesthesiology paging system in children and adults undergoing procedures at a tertiary care medical center.在一家三级医疗中心接受手术的儿童和成人使用基于计算机的麻醉学呼叫系统的紧急呼叫页面的特征。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Apr;116(4):904-10. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826bb636. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
7
Operative length independently affected by surgical team size: data from 2 Canadian hospitals.手术团队规模独立影响手术时长:来自加拿大 2 家医院的数据。
Can J Surg. 2012 Dec;55(6):371-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011311.