Pautex Sophie, Herrmann François R, Michon Agnès, Giannakopoulos Panteleimon, Gold Gabriel
Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Clin J Pain. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(9):774-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318154b6e3.
Self-report is the "gold standard" for pain assessment, however, observational pain scales, such as Doloplus-2 must be used for patients who cannot communicate. In this follow-up study, we report the psychometric properties of the observational Doloplus-2 scale using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score as a gold standard and evaluate its performance.
Prospective clinical study of 180 hospitalized older patients who demonstrated good comprehension and reliable use of the VAS: 131 participants with dementia and 49 without. All participants assessed their chronic pain using the VAS. Doloplus-2 was independently completed by the nursing team.
Mean age of patients (133 women, 47 men) was 83.7+/-6.5. Median mini-mental state examination of patients with diagnosis of dementia was 18.0+/-7.7. Nearly half of the patients (49%) reported that they experienced pain in response to a direct question. The administration of Doloplus-2 was possible in all 180 patients. Doloplus-2 correlated moderately with self-assessment (Spearman coefficient: 0.46). In a multiple regression model, Doloplus-2 predicted 41% of the variability in pain intensity measured by VAS. The somatic dimension alone explained 36% of the variance, the psychosocial bloc 5% with no better contribution of the psychomotor bloc. To shorten Doloplus-2, we constructed a version with only the 5 items that were significantly associated with the VAS score in the multiple regression models.
The observational Doloplus-2 scale correlates moderately with self-assessment pain score and has adequate internal consistency. Our data also suggest that Doloplus-2 could be substantially shortened as the brief version performed similarly to the complete Doloplus-2.
自我报告是疼痛评估的“金标准”,然而,对于无法沟通的患者,必须使用观察性疼痛量表,如Doloplus-2。在这项随访研究中,我们以视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分作为金标准,报告观察性Doloplus-2量表的心理测量特性并评估其性能。
对180名住院老年患者进行前瞻性临床研究,这些患者对VAS有良好的理解且能可靠使用VAS:131名患有痴呆症的参与者和49名未患痴呆症的参与者。所有参与者使用VAS评估其慢性疼痛。Doloplus-2由护理团队独立完成。
患者平均年龄(133名女性,47名男性)为83.7±6.5岁。诊断为痴呆症患者的简易精神状态检查表中位数为18.0±7.7。近一半的患者(49%)在直接询问时报告有疼痛经历。所有180名患者均可行Doloplus-2评估。Doloplus-2与自我评估呈中度相关(斯皮尔曼系数:0.46)。在多元回归模型中,Doloplus-2预测了VAS测量的疼痛强度变异性的41%。仅躯体维度解释了36%的方差,心理社会组为5%,心理运动组没有更好的贡献。为缩短Doloplus-2,我们构建了一个仅包含多元回归模型中与VAS评分显著相关的5个条目的版本。
观察性Doloplus-2量表与自我评估疼痛评分呈中度相关且具有足够的内部一致性。我们的数据还表明,Doloplus-2可以大幅缩短,因为简短版本的表现与完整的Doloplus-2相似。