• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关键资产保护的风险分析。

Risk analysis for critical asset protection.

作者信息

McGill William L, Ayyub Bilal M, Kaminskiy Mark

机构信息

Center for Technology and Systems Management, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2007 Oct;27(5):1265-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00955.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00955.x
PMID:18076495
Abstract

This article proposes a quantitative risk assessment and management framework that supports strategic asset-level resource allocation decision making for critical infrastructure and key resource protection. The proposed framework consists of five phases: scenario identification, consequence and criticality assessment, security vulnerability assessment, threat likelihood assessment, and benefit-cost analysis. Key innovations in this methodology include its initial focus on fundamental asset characteristics to generate an exhaustive set of plausible threat scenarios based on a target susceptibility matrix (which we refer to as asset-driven analysis) and an approach to threat likelihood assessment that captures adversary tendencies to shift their preferences in response to security investments based on the expected utilities of alternative attack profiles assessed from the adversary perspective. A notional example is provided to demonstrate an application of the proposed framework. Extensions of this model to support strategic portfolio-level analysis and tactical risk analysis are suggested.

摘要

本文提出了一个定量风险评估与管理框架,该框架支持针对关键基础设施和关键资源保护进行战略资产层面的资源分配决策。所提出的框架包括五个阶段:情景识别、后果与关键性评估、安全脆弱性评估、威胁可能性评估以及效益成本分析。这种方法的关键创新点包括:其最初侧重于基本资产特征,以基于目标易损性矩阵生成一套详尽的合理威胁情景(我们将其称为资产驱动分析);以及一种威胁可能性评估方法,该方法基于从对手角度评估的替代攻击方案的预期效用,捕捉对手因应安全投资而改变偏好的倾向。提供了一个概念示例来演示所提出框架的应用。还建议对该模型进行扩展,以支持战略投资组合层面的分析和战术风险分析。

相似文献

1
Risk analysis for critical asset protection.关键资产保护的风险分析。
Risk Anal. 2007 Oct;27(5):1265-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00955.x.
2
Critical asset and portfolio risk analysis: an all-hazards framework.
Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):789-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00911.x.
3
A risk-based approach to setting priorities in protecting bridges against terrorist attacks.一种基于风险的方法,用于确定在保护桥梁免受恐怖袭击方面的优先事项。
Risk Anal. 2004 Aug;24(4):963-84. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00500.x.
4
Some limitations of "Risk = Threat x Vulnerability x Consequence" for risk analysis of terrorist attacks.“风险=威胁×脆弱性×后果”用于恐怖袭击风险分析的一些局限性。
Risk Anal. 2008 Dec;28(6):1749-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01142.x. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
5
Development of a security vulnerability assessment process for the RAMCAP chemical sector.为RAMCAP化工行业开发安全漏洞评估流程。
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Apr 11;142(3):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.133. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
6
Using probabilistic terrorism risk modeling for regulatory benefit-cost analysis: application to the Western hemisphere travel initiative in the land environment.将概率性恐怖主义风险建模用于监管效益成本分析:在陆地环境中对西半球旅行倡议的应用
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):325-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01022.x.
7
Benefit adequacy among elderly Social Security retired-worker beneficiaries and the SSI federal benefit rate.老年社会保障退休工人受益人的福利充足性与补充保障收入联邦福利率。
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(3):29-51.
8
A decision framework for managing risk to airports from terrorist attack.一个管理机场遭受恐怖袭击风险的决策框架。
Risk Anal. 2015 Feb;35(2):292-306. doi: 10.1111/risa.12266. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
9
Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment.模糊证据推理在海上安全评估中的应用。
Risk Anal. 2009 Jan;29(1):95-120. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01158.x.
10
A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism.一种用于识别和排序因恐怖主义导致的基础设施脆弱性的筛选方法。
Risk Anal. 2005 Apr;25(2):361-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00595.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Causal Risk-Based Decision-Making Methodology: The Case of Coronavirus.一种新颖的基于因果风险的决策方法:以冠状病毒为例。
Risk Anal. 2021 May;41(5):814-830. doi: 10.1111/risa.13678. Epub 2021 Jan 14.