Silva E A, Iyer A, Ura S, Lauris J R, Naafs B, Das P K, Vilani-Moreno F
Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, Brazil.
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Dec;12(12):1450-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01951.x.
To verify the validity of measuring the levels of Mycobacterium leprae-specific anti-phenolic glycolipid (PGL)-I antibody, neopterin, a product of activated macrophages, and C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase protein, in serial serum samples from patients for monitoring the leprosy spectrum and reactions during the course of multi-drug treatment (MDT).
Twenty-five untreated leprosy patients, 15 multi-bacillary (MB) and 10 paucibacillary (PB), participated. Eight patients developed reversal reaction and five developed erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) during follow-up. The bacterial index (BI) in slit-skin smears was determined at diagnosis and blood samples collected by venipuncture at diagnosis and after 2, 4, 6 and 12 months of MDT. PGL-I antibody and neopterin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, whereas the CRP levels were measured by the latex agglutination method.
The levels of PGL-I antibodies and neopterin were higher in the sera of MB than PB patients, which correlated with the patients' BI. The serum levels of CRP did not differ significantly between the MB and PB patients. The serum levels of PGL-I and neopterin were no higher in reactional patients than non-reactional patients prone to such reactions. However, ENL patients had higher serum CRP levels than non-reactional MB patients. The serum PGL-I antibody levels declined significantly during MDT, in contrast to neopterin and CRP levels.
Measuring the serum levels of PGL-I antibodies and neopterin appeared to be useful in distinguishing MB from PB patients, whereas monitoring the levels of PGL-I antibodies appeared to be useful in monitoring MB patients on MDT. Measuring serum CRP, although not useful in monitoring the patients, has limited significance in detecting ENL reactional patients.
验证在多药治疗(MDT)过程中,检测患者系列血清样本中麻风分枝杆菌特异性抗酚糖脂(PGL)-I抗体、活化巨噬细胞产物新蝶呤以及急性期蛋白C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,以监测麻风病谱和反应的有效性。
25例未经治疗的麻风病患者参与研究,其中15例为多菌型(MB),10例为少菌型(PB)。8例患者在随访期间出现逆转反应,5例出现麻风结节性红斑(ENL)。在诊断时测定皮肤涂片的细菌指数(BI),并在诊断时以及MDT治疗2、4、6和12个月后通过静脉穿刺采集血样。采用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测PGL-I抗体和新蝶呤,采用乳胶凝集法检测CRP水平。
MB患者血清中PGL-I抗体和新蝶呤水平高于PB患者,且与患者的BI相关。MB和PB患者血清CRP水平无显著差异。反应性患者血清中PGL-I和新蝶呤水平并不高于易发生此类反应的非反应性患者。然而,ENL患者血清CRP水平高于非反应性MB患者。与新蝶呤和CRP水平相比,MDT期间血清PGL-I抗体水平显著下降。
检测血清PGL-I抗体和新蝶呤水平似乎有助于区分MB和PB患者,而监测PGL-I抗体水平似乎有助于监测接受MDT的MB患者。检测血清CRP虽然对监测患者无用,但在检测ENL反应性患者方面具有有限的意义。