Ogasawara Kuniaki, Sakai Nobuyuki, Kuroiwa Terumasa, Hosoda Kohkichi, Iihara Koji, Toyoda Kazunori, Sakai Chiaki, Nagata Izumi, Ogawa Akira
Department of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
J Neurosurg. 2007 Dec;107(6):1130-6. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/12/1130.
Intracranial hemorrhage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a rare but potentially devastating complication. In the present study the authors evaluated 4494 patients with carotid artery stenosis who had undergone CEA or CAS to clarify the clinicopathological features and outcomes of those with CHS and associated intracranial hemorrhage.
Patients with postoperative CHS were retrospectively selected, and clinicopathological features and outcomes were studied.
Sixty-one patients with CHS (1.4%) were identified, and intracranial hemorrhage developed in 27 of them (0.6%). The onset of CHS peaked on the 6th postoperative day in those who had undergone CEA and within 12 hours in those who had undergone CAS. Results of logistic regression analysis demonstrated that poor postoperative control of blood pressure was significantly associated with the development of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with CHS after CEA (p = 0.0164). Note, however, that none of the tested variables were significantly associated with the development of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with CHS after CAS. Mortality (p = 0.0010) and morbidity (p = 0.0172) rates were significantly higher in patients with intracranial hemorrhage than in those without.
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after CEA and CAS occurs with delayed classic and acute presentations, respectively. Although strict control of postoperative blood pressure prevents intracranial hemorrhage in patients with CHS after CEA, there appears to be no relationship between blood pressure control and intracranial hemorrhage in those with CHS after CAS. Finally, the prognosis of CHS in patients with associated intracerebral hemorrhage is poor.
颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后与脑过度灌注综合征(CHS)相关的颅内出血是一种罕见但可能具有毁灭性的并发症。在本研究中,作者评估了4494例接受CEA或CAS治疗的颈动脉狭窄患者,以明确CHS及相关颅内出血患者的临床病理特征和预后。
回顾性选取术后发生CHS的患者,研究其临床病理特征和预后。
共识别出61例CHS患者(1.4%),其中27例(0.6%)发生了颅内出血。接受CEA的患者CHS发病高峰出现在术后第6天,接受CAS的患者则在12小时内。逻辑回归分析结果显示,CEA术后CHS患者中,术后血压控制不佳与颅内出血的发生显著相关(p = 0.0164)。然而,需要注意的是,在接受CAS的CHS患者中,所测试的变量均与颅内出血的发生无显著相关性。颅内出血患者的死亡率(p = 0.0010)和发病率(p = 0.0172)显著高于无颅内出血的患者。
CEA和CAS后的脑过度灌注综合征分别表现为延迟的典型症状和急性症状。虽然严格控制术后血压可预防CEA术后CHS患者发生颅内出血,但在接受CAS的CHS患者中,血压控制与颅内出血之间似乎没有关系。最后,伴有脑内出血的CHS患者预后较差。