Trivedi Shephali, Dekermendjian Kim, Julien Ronald, Huang Jian, Lund Per-Eric, Krupp Johannes, Kronqvist Robert, Larsson Olof, Bostwick Robert
HTS Center and Global Support Department, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE 19850, USA.
Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2008 Apr;6(2):167-79. doi: 10.1089/adt.2007.090.
Ion channels are challenging targets in the early phases of the drug discovery process, especially because of the lack of technologies available to screen large numbers of compounds in functionally relevant assays. The electrophysiological patch-clamp technique, which is the gold standard for studying ion channels, has low throughput and is not amenable to screening large numbers of compounds. However, for random high-throughput screening (HTS) of compounds against ion channel targets, a number of functional cellular assays have become available during the last few years. Here we use the sodium channel NaV1.7 stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and compare three HTS assays-a Li flux atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) assay, a fluorescent imaging plate reader (FLIP, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) membrane potential assay, and a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based membrane potential assay-to an automated electrophysiological assay (the Ionworks HT [Molecular Devices] platform) and characterize 11 known NaV inhibitors. Our results show that all three HTS assays are suitable for identification of NaV1.7 inhibitors, but as an HTS assay the Li-AAS assay is more robust with higher Z' values than the FLIPR and FRET-based membrane potential assays. Furthermore, there was a better correlation between the Ionworks assay and the Li-AAS assay regarding the potency of the NaV inhibitors investigated. This paper describes the first comparison between all the HTS assays available today to study voltage-gated NaVs, and the results suggest that the Li-AAS assay is more suited as a first HTS assay when starting an NaV drug discovery campaign.
离子通道是药物研发早期阶段具有挑战性的靶点,特别是因为缺乏可在功能相关检测中筛选大量化合物的技术。作为研究离子通道的金标准,膜片钳电生理技术通量低,不适用于大量化合物的筛选。然而,在过去几年中,出现了一些针对离子通道靶点进行化合物随机高通量筛选(HTS)的功能性细胞检测方法。在此,我们使用稳定表达于人类胚胎肾293细胞中的钠通道NaV1.7,并将三种HTS检测方法——锂通量原子吸收光谱(AAS)检测、荧光成像微孔板读数器(FLIP,Molecular Devices,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔市)膜电位检测以及基于荧光共振能量转移(FRET)的膜电位检测——与一种自动化电生理检测方法(Ionworks HT [Molecular Devices]平台)进行比较,并对11种已知的NaV抑制剂进行表征。我们的结果表明,所有这三种HTS检测方法都适用于鉴定NaV1.7抑制剂,但作为一种HTS检测方法,锂-AAS检测比基于FLIPR和FRET的膜电位检测更稳健,Z'值更高。此外,就所研究的NaV抑制剂的效力而言,Ionworks检测与锂-AAS检测之间的相关性更好。本文描述了目前所有用于研究电压门控性NaV的HTS检测方法之间的首次比较,结果表明,在启动NaV药物研发项目时,锂-AAS检测更适合作为第一种HTS检测方法。