• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌多学科诊疗团队:团队视角

Colorectal MDTs: the team's perspective.

作者信息

Sharma A, Sharp D M, Walker L G, Monson J R T

机构信息

Academic Surgical Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jan;10(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01209.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01209.x
PMID:18078461
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are an integral part of the National Cancer Plan. However, there is surprisingly little empirical research on how these are perceived by colorectal surgeons (CRSs) and colorectal clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). The purpose of this study therefore was to obtain the views of a national cohort of CRSs and CNSs regarding various important aspects of MDT functioning and role of CNS in current setting.

METHOD

Two hundred and fifty-three CRSs and 177 CNSs, identified from the Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland, responded to an ad hoc postal questionnaire.

RESULTS

96.5% of respondents considered that MDTs improved the overall quality of care of colorectal cancer patients, and 78.6% thought MDTs were good for their morale. Eighty per cent considered that they improved training. Seventy-three per cent of surgeons and nurses thought that MDTs were cost effective, and 89% did not consider them to be a passing fad. However, more than half (50.4%) of the CRSs and 35.2% of the CNSs stated that their job plan did not contain adequate time to attend MDT meetings. Compared with CRSs, CNSs were significantly more likely to have positive views regarding the MDT (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

CNSs and CRSs consider that colorectal MDTs have very beneficial effects on patient care, training and morale. However, many surgeons and nurse specialists consider that attendance at MDTs is not taken into account adequately in terms of their job plans, and this issue needs to be addressed.

摘要

目的

多学科团队(MDTs)是国家癌症计划的一个组成部分。然而,令人惊讶的是,关于结直肠外科医生(CRSs)和结直肠临床护理专家(CNSs)如何看待这些团队的实证研究却很少。因此,本研究的目的是获取一组全国性的CRSs和CNSs对MDT运作的各个重要方面以及CNS在当前环境中的作用的看法。

方法

从大不列颠及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会中识别出253名CRSs和177名CNSs,他们回复了一份特别邮寄问卷。

结果

96.5%的受访者认为MDTs提高了结直肠癌患者的整体护理质量,78.6%的人认为MDTs对他们的士气有好处。80%的人认为MDTs改善了培训。73%的外科医生和护士认为MDTs具有成本效益,89%的人不认为它们是一时的风尚。然而,超过一半(50.4%)的CRSs和35.2%的CNSs表示,他们的工作计划中没有足够的时间参加MDT会议。与CRSs相比,CNSs对MDT的积极看法明显更多(P < 0.005)。

结论

CNSs和CRSs认为结直肠MDTs对患者护理、培训和士气有非常有益的影响。然而,许多外科医生和护士专家认为,就他们的工作计划而言,参加MDT会议没有得到充分考虑,这个问题需要解决。

相似文献

1
Colorectal MDTs: the team's perspective.结直肠癌多学科诊疗团队:团队视角
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jan;10(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01209.x.
2
The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership?英国多学科癌症团队中肿瘤学家的作用:团队领导的未开发资源?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01507.x. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
3
The impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists on the decision making process in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study.临床护理专家对癌症多学科团队会议决策过程的影响:一项定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Dec;43:101674. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101674. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study.多学科癌症团队中团队合作和以患者为中心的促进因素和障碍:一项全国性研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 May;20(5):1408-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2676-9. Epub 2012 Oct 20.
5
Will virtual multidisciplinary team meetings become the norm for musculoskeletal oncology care following the COVID-19 pandemic? - experience from a tertiary sarcoma centre.在新冠疫情之后,虚拟多学科团队会议会成为肌肉骨骼肿瘤护理的常态吗?——来自一家三级肉瘤中心的经验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 5;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03925-8.
6
Stress and burnout among colorectal surgeons and colorectal nurse specialists working in the National Health Service.在国民医疗服务体系工作的结直肠外科医生和结直肠专科护士的压力与职业倦怠情况。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;10(4):397-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01338.x. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
7
Teamwork and team performance in multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment tool.多学科癌症团队中的团队合作和团队绩效:观察性评估工具的开发和评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Oct;20(10):849-56. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048660. Epub 2011 May 24.
8
Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments.多学科癌症团队的质量改进:对团队合作和临床决策的调查以及评估的交叉验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3535-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5. Epub 2011 May 19.
9
An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team.对一个结直肠癌多学科团队治疗决策的评估。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct;10(8):769-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01464.x. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
10
Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review.考虑合并症在多学科癌症团队会议中的治疗决策中的作用:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1325-32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv025. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
MDT-How it is important in rectal cancer.MDT—它在直肠癌中为何重要。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Sep;48(9):2807-2813. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03977-z. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
2
A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison.结直肠多学科团队会议的系统评价:国际比较。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab044.
3
2021 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Management of Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.2021 年美国甲状腺协会甲状腺间变性癌患者管理指南。
Thyroid. 2021 Mar;31(3):337-386. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0944.
4
Multidisciplinary Imaging Review Conference Improves Neuro-oncology Radiation Treatment Planning and Follow-up.多学科影像审查会议改善了神经肿瘤放射治疗计划与随访。
Cureus. 2019 Oct 10;11(10):e5882. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5882.
5
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.多学科团队方法对晚期和复发性结直肠癌管理的影响
World J Surg. 2018 Jul;42(7):2227-2233. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4409-5.
6
The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?多学科团队会议(MDTMs)的激增:放射科部门如何继续支持所有这些会议?
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3760-x. Epub 2015 May 1.
7
A multidisciplinary clinical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer complicated with rectovesical fistula: a case report.局部晚期直肠癌合并直肠膀胱瘘的多学科临床治疗:病例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2012 Oct 29;6:369. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-369.
8
Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision.增加使用多学科治疗方法对通过最佳全直肠系膜切除治疗的直肠癌的结果影响不大。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;27(10):1275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1440-8. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
9
The effect of multidisciplinary team care on cancer management.多学科团队护理对癌症管理的影响。
Pan Afr Med J. 2011;9:20. doi: 10.4314/pamj.v9i1.71195. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
10
Multidisciplinary team meeting before therapeutic ERCP: A prospective study with 1,909 cases.治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术前多学科团队会议:一项纳入1909例病例的前瞻性研究。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr-Jun;1(2):64-69. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.15047.