• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用正面碰撞比较不同代次正面安全气囊对驾驶员死亡风险的影响:一项配对队列研究。

Using head-on collisions to compare risk of driver death by frontal air bag generation: a matched-pair cohort study.

作者信息

Braver Elisa R, Kufera Joseph A, Alexander Melvin T, Scerbo Marge, Volpini Karen, Lloyd Joseph P

机构信息

National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):546-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm336. Epub 2007 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwm336
PMID:18079131
Abstract

US air bag regulations were changed in 1997 to allow tests of unbelted male dummies in vehicles mounted and accelerated on sleds, resulting in longer crash pulses than rigid-barrier crashes. This change facilitated depowering of frontal air bags and was intended to reduce air bag-induced deaths. Controversy ensued as to whether sled-certified air bags could increase adult fatality risk. A matched-pair cohort study of two-vehicle, head-on, fatal collisions between drivers involving first-generation versus sled-certified air bags during 1998-2005 was conducted by using Fatality Analysis Reporting System data. Sled certification was ascertained from public information and a survey of automakers. Conditional Poisson regression for matched-pair cohorts was used to estimate risk ratios adjusted for age, seat belt status, vehicle type, passenger car size, and model year for driver deaths in vehicles with sled-certified air bags versus first-generation air bags. For all passenger-vehicle pairs, the adjusted risk ratio was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.98). In head-on collisions involving only passenger cars, the adjusted risk ratio was 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 0.85, 1.29). Increased fatality risk for drivers with sled-certified air bags was not observed. A borderline significant interaction between vehicle type and air bag generation suggested that sled-certified air bags may have reduced the risk of dying in head-on collisions among drivers of pickup trucks.

摘要

1997年,美国对安全气囊法规进行了修订,允许在安装在雪橇上并加速行驶的车辆中对未系安全带的男性假人进行测试,这导致碰撞脉冲比刚性障碍物碰撞时更长。这一变化促使正面安全气囊降低充气量,旨在减少安全气囊导致的死亡人数。对于经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊是否会增加成人死亡风险,引发了争议。利用死亡分析报告系统的数据,对1998年至2005年期间涉及第一代与经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊的驾驶员之间的两车正面致命碰撞进行了配对队列研究。通过公开信息和对汽车制造商的调查确定雪橇测试认证情况。采用配对队列的条件泊松回归来估计经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊车辆与第一代安全气囊车辆中驾驶员死亡的风险比,并对年龄、安全带使用情况、车辆类型、乘用车尺寸和车型年份进行了调整。对于所有乘用车对,调整后的风险比为0.87(95%置信区间:0.77,0.98)。在仅涉及乘用车的正面碰撞中,调整后的风险比为1.04(95%置信区间:0.85,1.29)。未观察到使用经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊的驾驶员死亡风险增加。车辆类型与安全气囊代次之间存在边缘显著的交互作用,表明经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊可能降低了皮卡驾驶员在正面碰撞中的死亡风险。

相似文献

1
Using head-on collisions to compare risk of driver death by frontal air bag generation: a matched-pair cohort study.采用正面碰撞比较不同代次正面安全气囊对驾驶员死亡风险的影响:一项配对队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):546-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm336. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
2
Re: "Using head-on collisions to compare risk of driver death by frontal air bag generation: a matched-pair cohort study".
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 1;167(7):885-6; author reply 886-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn052. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
3
Deaths among drivers and right-front passengers in frontal collisions: redesigned air bags relative to first-generation air bags.正面碰撞中驾驶员和右前乘客的死亡情况:相对于第一代安全气囊的重新设计的安全气囊。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Mar;9(1):48-58. doi: 10.1080/15389580701722787.
4
Driver mortality in frontal crashes: comparison of newer and older airbag designs.正面碰撞中的驾驶员死亡率:新旧安全气囊设计的比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2005 Mar;6(1):24-30. doi: 10.1080/15389580590903140.
5
Association of first- and second-generation air bags with front occupant death in car crashes: a matched cohort study.第一代和第二代安全气囊与车祸中前排乘客死亡的关联:一项匹配队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jul 15;164(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj167. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
6
How have changes in air bag designs affected frontal crash mortality?安全气囊设计的变化如何影响正面碰撞死亡率?
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):499-510. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.04.005.
7
How have changes in front air bag designs affected frontal crash death rates? An update.前气囊设计的变化如何影响正面碰撞死亡率?最新研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(6):606-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.853295.
8
Risk of injury associated with the use of seat belts and air bags in motor vehicle crashes.机动车碰撞事故中使用安全带和安全气囊相关的受伤风险。
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):290-6.
9
Effects of child age and body size on serious injury from passenger air-bag presence in motor vehicle crashes.儿童年龄和体型对机动车碰撞事故中乘客安全气囊导致严重伤害的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1579-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0555.
10
Injury risk to restrained children exposed to deployed first- and second-generation air bags in frontal crashes.正面碰撞中,受约束儿童暴露于已展开的第一代和第二代安全气囊下的受伤风险。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Apr;159(4):342-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.342.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of serotonin toxicity among veterans affairs patients receiving linezolid and vancomycin.接受利奈唑胺和万古霉素治疗的退伍军人事务部患者中血清素毒性的比较评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec;57(12):5901-11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00921-13. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
2
Degree of urbanization and mortality from motor vehicular crashes.城市化程度与机动车碰撞死亡率
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:183-90.
3
Crash-related mortality and model year: are newer vehicles safer?与碰撞相关的死亡率和车型年份:新车更安全吗?
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:113-21.
4
Effectiveness of mandatory alcohol testing programs in reducing alcohol involvement in fatal motor carrier crashes.强制酒精检测计划在减少致命货运车辆撞车事故中酒精相关因素方面的有效性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Sep 15;170(6):775-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp202. Epub 2009 Aug 19.