Suppr超能文献

采用正面碰撞比较不同代次正面安全气囊对驾驶员死亡风险的影响:一项配对队列研究。

Using head-on collisions to compare risk of driver death by frontal air bag generation: a matched-pair cohort study.

作者信息

Braver Elisa R, Kufera Joseph A, Alexander Melvin T, Scerbo Marge, Volpini Karen, Lloyd Joseph P

机构信息

National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):546-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm336. Epub 2007 Dec 12.

Abstract

US air bag regulations were changed in 1997 to allow tests of unbelted male dummies in vehicles mounted and accelerated on sleds, resulting in longer crash pulses than rigid-barrier crashes. This change facilitated depowering of frontal air bags and was intended to reduce air bag-induced deaths. Controversy ensued as to whether sled-certified air bags could increase adult fatality risk. A matched-pair cohort study of two-vehicle, head-on, fatal collisions between drivers involving first-generation versus sled-certified air bags during 1998-2005 was conducted by using Fatality Analysis Reporting System data. Sled certification was ascertained from public information and a survey of automakers. Conditional Poisson regression for matched-pair cohorts was used to estimate risk ratios adjusted for age, seat belt status, vehicle type, passenger car size, and model year for driver deaths in vehicles with sled-certified air bags versus first-generation air bags. For all passenger-vehicle pairs, the adjusted risk ratio was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.98). In head-on collisions involving only passenger cars, the adjusted risk ratio was 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 0.85, 1.29). Increased fatality risk for drivers with sled-certified air bags was not observed. A borderline significant interaction between vehicle type and air bag generation suggested that sled-certified air bags may have reduced the risk of dying in head-on collisions among drivers of pickup trucks.

摘要

1997年,美国对安全气囊法规进行了修订,允许在安装在雪橇上并加速行驶的车辆中对未系安全带的男性假人进行测试,这导致碰撞脉冲比刚性障碍物碰撞时更长。这一变化促使正面安全气囊降低充气量,旨在减少安全气囊导致的死亡人数。对于经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊是否会增加成人死亡风险,引发了争议。利用死亡分析报告系统的数据,对1998年至2005年期间涉及第一代与经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊的驾驶员之间的两车正面致命碰撞进行了配对队列研究。通过公开信息和对汽车制造商的调查确定雪橇测试认证情况。采用配对队列的条件泊松回归来估计经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊车辆与第一代安全气囊车辆中驾驶员死亡的风险比,并对年龄、安全带使用情况、车辆类型、乘用车尺寸和车型年份进行了调整。对于所有乘用车对,调整后的风险比为0.87(95%置信区间:0.77,0.98)。在仅涉及乘用车的正面碰撞中,调整后的风险比为1.04(95%置信区间:0.85,1.29)。未观察到使用经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊的驾驶员死亡风险增加。车辆类型与安全气囊代次之间存在边缘显著的交互作用,表明经过雪橇测试认证的安全气囊可能降低了皮卡驾驶员在正面碰撞中的死亡风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验