• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Discussions by elders and adult children about end-of-life preparation and preferences.长辈与成年子女就临终准备和偏好进行的讨论。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A08. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
2
"They don't want to hear us": Hispanic elders and adult children speak about end-of-life planning.“他们不想听我们的”:西班牙裔老年人与成年子女谈临终规划
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2006;2(1):55-70. doi: 10.1300/J457v02n01_05.
3
Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.非裔美国人、白种人和西班牙裔代孕者关于临终决策负担的声音。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar;23(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
4
Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.患者对于与医生交流临终决策的偏好。支持性治疗研究组。了解预后及对治疗结果和风险的偏好研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):1-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00001.
5
End-of-life discussions and preferences among persons with HIV.艾滋病毒感染者的临终讨论及偏好。
JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2880-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2880.
6
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
7
Deficits in Advance Care Planning for Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis at Liver Transplant Centers.失代偿期肝硬化患者在肝移植中心的超前护理计划不足。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):652-660. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0152.
8
The personal and social context of planning for end-of-life care.临终关怀规划的个人与社会背景。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1163-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52316.x.
9
The doctor's role in discussing advance preferences for end-of-life care: perceptions of physicians practicing in the VA.医生在讨论临终护理的预先偏好方面的作用:对在退伍军人事务部执业的医生的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):399-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05162.x.
10
The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making.医生的种族、年龄和性别对医生关于预立医疗指示的态度以及临终决策偏好的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 May;47(5):579-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02573.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Living and dying between cultural traditions in African & Caribbean Heritage families: a constructivist grounded theory.在非裔加勒比传统家庭中生活和死亡:建构主义扎根理论。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 18;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01503-6.
2
Expectations in the Communication About Death and Dying: Development and Initial Validation of the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale.对死亡和濒死沟通的期望:生命末期对话 - 期望量表的编制及初步验证。
Omega (Westport). 2024 Dec;90(2):710-725. doi: 10.1177/00302228221110726. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
3
Brain Activation during Thoughts of One's Own Death and Its Linear and Curvilinear Correlations with Fear of Death in Elderly Individuals: An fMRI Study.老年人想到自己死亡时的大脑激活及其与死亡恐惧的线性和曲线相关性:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021 Jan 28;2(1):tgab003. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab003. eCollection 2021.
4
Barriers to Perinatal Palliative Care Consultation.围产期姑息治疗咨询的障碍。
Front Pediatr. 2020 Sep 22;8:590616. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.590616. eCollection 2020.
5
Perspectives of elders and their adult children of Black and minority ethnic heritage on end-of-life conversations: A meta-ethnography.黑人和少数族裔背景的老年人及其成年子女对临终谈话的看法:元民族志。
Palliat Med. 2020 Feb;34(2):195-208. doi: 10.1177/0269216319887070. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Predictors of Advance Care Planning in Older Women: The Nurses' Health Study.老年女性的预先护理计划预测因素:护士健康研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Feb;67(2):292-301. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15656. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
7
Race and Gender Differences in Correlates of Death Anxiety Among Elderly in the United States.美国老年人死亡焦虑相关因素中的种族与性别差异
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016 May 31;10(2):e2024. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-2024. eCollection 2016 Jun.
8
Interventions to encourage discussion of end-of-life preferences between members of the general population and the people closest to them - a systematic literature review.鼓励普通人群及其最亲近的人之间讨论临终偏好的干预措施 - 系统文献回顾。
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Nov 4;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-40.
9
African American and non-African American patients' and families' decision making about renal replacement therapies.非裔美国患者和非裔美国患者及其家属对肾脏替代治疗的决策。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Jul;22(7):997-1006. doi: 10.1177/1049732312443427.
10
Decision making in advanced heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.晚期心力衰竭的决策制定:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2012 Apr 17;125(15):1928-52. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31824f2173. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: an assessment of psychosocial influences.年轻老年人的临终医疗护理规划:心理社会影响评估
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):S135-41. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.s135.
2
Deaths: preliminary data for 2004.死亡情况:2004年初步数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Jun 28;54(19):1-49.
3
The quest to reform end of life care: rethinking assumptions and setting new directions.改革临终关怀的探索:反思假设并设定新方向。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Nov-Dec;Spec No:S52-7. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2005.0098.
4
Development of public health priorities for end-of-life initiatives.制定临终关怀倡议的公共卫生优先事项。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Dec;29(5):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.014.
5
The personal and social context of planning for end-of-life care.临终关怀规划的个人与社会背景。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1163-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52316.x.
6
Enough. The failure of the living will.够了。生前预嘱的失败。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):30-42.
7
Planning for the end of life: the views of older people about advance care statements.临终规划:老年人对预立医疗声明的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.005.
8
"Choice" in end-of-life decision making: researching fact or fiction?临终决策中的“选择”:探究事实还是虚构?
Gerontologist. 2002 Oct;42 Spec No 3:114-28. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.114.
9
A commentary: hospital experience and meaning at the end of life.一篇评论:医院体验与生命末期的意义
Gerontologist. 2002 Oct;42 Spec No 3:34-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.34.
10
Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial.作为沟通行为的预立医疗指示:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Feb 12;161(3):421-30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.421.

长辈与成年子女就临终准备和偏好进行的讨论。

Discussions by elders and adult children about end-of-life preparation and preferences.

作者信息

Glass Anne P, Nahapetyan Lusine

机构信息

Institute of Gerontology, College of Public Health, University of Georgia Institute of Gerontology, 255 East Hancock Ave., Athens, GA 30602, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A08. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

PMID:18081997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2248775/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, 73% of deaths occur among people aged 65 years or older. Although most would prefer to die at home after a short illness, most actually die in institutions after prolonged declines. Despite this discrepancy, elders and their adult children often do not discuss end-of-life preferences. Use of advance directives has not been widespread, and people often avoid the subject until a crisis. This project focused on informal family communication about end-of-life preparation and preferences, about which little is known.

METHODS

In May 2006, we conducted in-depth exploratory interviews with 15 older adults about their end-of-life preparation and preferences and with 15 younger adults about their parents' end-of-life preparation and preferences. The interview included an item rating the depth of discussion.

RESULTS

Participants in both groups were primarily female and white. Mean age of older adults was 78.6 years (range, 70-88 years). Mean age of younger adults was 53.1 years (range, 42-63 years); mean age of their parents was 82.6 years (range, 68-99 years). Nine older adults reported discussing end-of-life preparation and preferences with their adult children; six had barely discussed the topic at all. Ten younger adults reported having talked with their parents about end-of-life preparation and preferences; five had not discussed it. Barriers to discussions about end-of-life preparation and preferences were fear of death, trust in others to make decisions, family dynamics, and uncertainty about preferences. Facilitators for discussion were acceptance of the reality of death, prior experience with death, religion or spirituality, and a desire to help the family. Successful strategies included casually approaching the topic and writing down end-of-life preparation and preferences.

CONCLUSION

Knowing the obstacles to and facilitators for discussion can help health care and public health professionals target approaches to encouraging elders and their families to discuss end-of-life preparation and preferences before a crisis.

摘要

引言

在美国,73%的死亡发生在65岁及以上的人群中。尽管大多数人希望在短暂患病后在家中离世,但实际上大多数人在长期身体衰退后在医疗机构中死亡。尽管存在这种差异,但老年人及其成年子女往往不讨论临终偏好。预先指示的使用并不广泛,人们通常会避免谈论这个话题,直到危机出现。本项目聚焦于关于临终准备和偏好的非正式家庭沟通,对此人们了解甚少。

方法

2006年5月,我们对15名老年人进行了关于他们的临终准备和偏好的深入探索性访谈,并对15名年轻人进行了关于他们父母的临终准备和偏好的深入探索性访谈。访谈包括一项对讨论深度进行评分的项目。

结果

两组参与者主要为女性和白人。老年人的平均年龄为78.6岁(范围为70 - 88岁)。年轻人的平均年龄为53.1岁(范围为42 - 63岁);他们父母的平均年龄为82.6岁(范围为68 - 99岁)。9名老年人报告与他们的成年子女讨论过临终准备和偏好;6名老年人几乎完全没有讨论过这个话题。10名年轻人报告与他们的父母谈论过临终准备和偏好;5名年轻人没有讨论过。关于临终准备和偏好讨论的障碍包括对死亡的恐惧、信任他人做决定、家庭动态以及偏好的不确定性。讨论的促进因素包括接受死亡的现实、先前的死亡经历、宗教或精神信仰以及帮助家人的愿望。成功的策略包括不经意地提及这个话题以及写下临终准备和偏好。

结论

了解讨论的障碍和促进因素可以帮助医疗保健和公共卫生专业人员确定方法,以鼓励老年人及其家人在危机发生前讨论临终准备和偏好。