• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非裔美国人、白种人和西班牙裔代孕者关于临终决策负担的声音。

Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.

作者信息

Braun Ursula K, Beyth Rebecca J, Ford Marvella E, McCullough Laurence B

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Section of Health Services Research, Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar;23(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7
PMID:18172738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2359470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-of-life decisions are frequently made by patients' surrogates. Race and ethnicity may affect such decision making. Few studies have described how different racial/ethnic groups experience end-of-life surrogate decision making.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the self-reported experience the self-reported experience of African-American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogate decision makers of seriously ill patients and to examine the relationship of race, ethnicity, and culture to that experience.

DESIGN

Purposive sample to include racial/ethnic minorities in a qualitative study using focus group interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants of the study were 44 experienced, mostly female, surrogate decision makers for older veterans.

APPROACH

Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify major themes, with particular attention to themes that might be unique to each of the three groups.

RESULTS

The experience of burden of end-of-life decision making was similar in all three groups. This burden in its medical, personal, and familial dimensions is compounded by uncertainty about prognosis and the patient's preferences. Racial/ethnic variations of responses to this burden concerned the physician-family relationship, religion and faith, and past experiences with race/ethnicity concordant versus non-concordant physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of race/ethnicity, surrogates for seriously ill patients appeared to experience increased significant, multidimensional burdens of decision making under conditions of uncertainty about a patient's preferences. This aspect of the burden of surrogate decision making may not be fully appreciated by physicians. Physicians should identify and be especially attentive to strategies used by surrogates, which may vary by race/ethnicity, to reduce the uncertainty about a patient's preferences and thus the burden of surrogate decision making to assist them in this difficult process.

摘要

背景

临终决策通常由患者的替代决策者做出。种族和民族可能会影响此类决策。很少有研究描述不同种族/民族群体在临终替代决策中的经历。

目的

描述非裔美国人、白人和西班牙裔重症患者替代决策者的自我报告经历,并研究种族、民族和文化与该经历的关系。

设计

在一项定性研究中采用目的抽样法纳入种族/民族少数群体,使用焦点小组访谈。

参与者

该研究的参与者是44名经验丰富的老年退伍军人替代决策者,大多数为女性。

方法

对访谈记录进行定性分析以确定主要主题,特别关注可能在三组中各自独有的主题。

结果

三组在临终决策负担的经历方面相似。这种负担在医疗、个人和家庭层面因预后的不确定性以及患者的偏好而加剧。对这种负担的反应在种族/民族方面的差异涉及医患关系、宗教和信仰,以及过去与种族/民族相符和不相符的医生打交道的经历。

结论

无论种族/民族如何,重症患者的替代决策者在患者偏好不确定的情况下似乎都面临着增加的、重大的、多维度的决策负担。医生可能并未充分认识到替代决策负担的这一方面。医生应识别并特别关注替代决策者所采用的策略,这些策略可能因种族/民族而异,以减少患者偏好的不确定性,从而减轻替代决策的负担,在这一艰难过程中帮助他们。

相似文献

1
Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.非裔美国人、白种人和西班牙裔代孕者关于临终决策负担的声音。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar;23(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
2
Decision-making styles of seriously ill male Veterans for end-of-life care: Autonomists, Altruists, Authorizers, Absolute Trusters, and Avoiders.重病男性退伍军人在临终关怀方面的决策风格:自主决策型、利他主义型、授权决策型、绝对信任型和回避决策型。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
3
The physician's professional role in end-of-life decision-making: voices of racially and ethnically diverse physicians.医生在临终决策中的专业角色:不同种族和族裔的医生的声音。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
4
Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups.关于不同种族或族裔群体临终决策的当前研究发现。
Gerontologist. 2005 Oct;45(5):634-41. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.5.634.
5
Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.为住院老年人做决策:家庭代理人考虑的伦理因素。
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34.
6
Process and impact of an advance care planning intervention evaluated by bereaved surrogate decision-makers of dialysis patients.由透析患者的丧亲替代决策者评估的预先护理计划干预措施的过程与影响。
Palliat Med. 2017 Mar;31(3):267-274. doi: 10.1177/0269216316652012. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
7
Older Adult and Surrogate Perspectives on Serious, Difficult, and Important Medical Decisions.老年患者及其代理人对严重、困难和重要医疗决策的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1515-1523. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15426. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
8
The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making.医生的种族、年龄和性别对医生关于预立医疗指示的态度以及临终决策偏好的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 May;47(5):579-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02573.x.
9
Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others.幸存的替代决策:哪些因素有助于或阻碍为他人做出医疗决策的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0252-y. Epub 2007 Jul 7.
10
Cross-cultural similarities and differences in attitudes about advance care planning.关于预先医疗护理计划的态度的跨文化异同。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jan;17(1):48-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.01032.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial Concerns Are Common Among Family Surrogate Decision-Makers of Patients With Stroke: A Mixed Methods Study.经济担忧在中风患者的家庭替代决策者中很常见:一项混合方法研究。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;15(2):e200451. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200451. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Preparing Surrogates for Decision-Making: Development and Pilot Testing of Prepare for Their Care.为代孕者进行决策准备:“为她们的护理做准备”的开发与试点测试
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Apr;69(4):e265-e271. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.026. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Improving Outcomes for ICU Family Members: The Role of Spiritual Care.改善重症监护室家庭成员的结局:精神关怀的作用。
J Palliat Med. 2025 Apr;28(4):538-548. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0165. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Effectiveness of an Advance Care Planning Intervention in Adults Receiving Dialysis and Their Families: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.接受透析治疗的成年人及其家属的预先医疗照护计划干预的效果:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351511. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51511.
5
Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义危重症患者的限时临床试验:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):187-199. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-925ST.
6
Barriers to Surrogate Application of Patient Values in Medical Decisions in Acute Stroke: Qualitative Study in a Biethnic Community.急性卒中医疗决策中患者价值观替代应用的障碍:双种族社区的定性研究
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Feb;40(1):215-224. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01724-2. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
What Counts as a Surrogate Decision?何为代理人决策?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Feb;41(2):125-132. doi: 10.1177/10499091231168976. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Giving up on the objective of providing goal-concordant care: Advance care planning for improving caregiver outcomes.放弃提供目标一致的护理的目标:预先护理计划以改善护理人员的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Oct;70(10):3006-3011. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18000. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Case report on the legal assurance of Advance Care Planning in collective culture.集体文化背景下预先医疗计划法律保障的病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Apr 20;10(4):e05759. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5759. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Surrogate Decision Makers Need Better Preparation for Their Role: Advice from Experienced Surrogates.代理人决策制定者需要更好地为其角色做准备:有经验的代理人的建议。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;25(6):857-863. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0283. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU.一份针对在重症监护病房(ICU)死亡患者亲属的沟通策略及手册。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446.
2
Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005.以患者为中心的重症监护病房中支持家庭的临床实践指南:美国危重病医学会特别工作组,2004 - 2005年
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):605-22. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254067.14607.EB.
3
Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.超越替代判断:代理人如何进行临终决策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x.
4
Does caregiving increase poverty among women in later life? Evidence from the Health and Retirement survey.照顾他人是否会增加老年女性的贫困率?来自健康与退休调查的证据。
J Health Soc Behav. 2006 Sep;47(3):258-74. doi: 10.1177/002214650604700305.
5
End-of-life family conferences: rooted in the evidence.临终家庭会议:基于证据
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11 Suppl):S364-72. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237049.44246.8C.
6
Racial/ethnic preferences, sex preferences, and perceived discrimination related to end-of-life care.与临终关怀相关的种族/族裔偏好、性别偏好及感知到的歧视。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):150-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00526.x.
7
Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups.关于不同种族或族裔群体临终决策的当前研究发现。
Gerontologist. 2005 Oct;45(5):634-41. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.5.634.
8
Focus group findings about the influence of culture on communication preferences in end-of-life care.焦点小组关于文化对临终关怀中沟通偏好影响的研究结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):703-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0151.x.
9
End-of-life care and African Americans: voices from the community.临终关怀与非裔美国人:来自社区的声音
J Palliat Med. 2005 Jun;8(3):585-92. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.585.
10
Dawning of awareness: the experience of surrogate decision making at the end of life.意识的觉醒:临终时替代决策的经历。
J Clin Ethics. 2005 Spring;16(1):28-45.