Davies R, Hunter L, Loyn T, Rees J
Department of Adult Dental Health, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XY.
Br Dent J. 2008 Jan 26;204(2):E3; discussion 84-5. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.1203. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
To assess the erosive potential of a number of commercially available sour sweets in the laboratory.
The erosive potential was assessed by measuring the pH, neutralisable acidity and ability to erode permanent and deciduous enamel. These parameters were compared to those of an orange juice positive control.
The pH of the sour sweets ranged from 2.30-3.14 with their neutralisable acidity ranging from 9.78-66.9 ml of 0.1M NaOH. The amount of permanent enamel removed following one hour immersion in the drinks ranged from 2.16-10.88 microm and from 1.02-18.34 microm for deciduous enamel. In comparison, the orange juice (Tropicana smooth) control had a pH of 3.86, a neutralisable acidity of 37.1 ml of 0.1M NaOH and removed 5.23 microm of permanent enamel and 6.27 microm of deciduous enamel.
All the sour sweets tested were found to be erosive, some more so than orange juice. This information will be of use to clinicians when counseling younger patients with tooth surface loss.
在实验室评估多种市售酸味糖果的侵蚀潜力。
通过测量pH值、可中和酸度以及对恒牙和乳牙釉质的侵蚀能力来评估侵蚀潜力。将这些参数与橙汁阳性对照的参数进行比较。
酸味糖果的pH值范围为2.30 - 3.14,其可中和酸度范围为9.78 - 66.9毫升0.1M氢氧化钠。饮料浸泡1小时后,恒牙釉质去除量范围为2.16 - 10.88微米,乳牙釉质为1.02 - 18.34微米。相比之下,橙汁(纯果乐顺滑型)对照的pH值为3.86,可中和酸度为37.1毫升0.1M氢氧化钠,去除恒牙釉质5.23微米,乳牙釉质6.27微米。
所有测试的酸味糖果都具有侵蚀性,有些比橙汁的侵蚀性更强。该信息将有助于临床医生为牙齿表面磨损的年轻患者提供咨询。