Barillà F, Vitarelli A, Pace V, Artico M, Di Fusco W
II Cattedra di Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare, Università degli Studi di Roma, La Sapienza.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1991 Nov;39(11):415-20.
In order to assess left ventricular function in adults and children with ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD), 42 patients were examined by hemodynamic and angiocardiographic techniques. Patients were divided into three groups: Group I, 18 patients (mean age 42 years) with ASD; Group II, 14 patients (mean age 9 years) with ASD; Group III, 10 patients without cardiopathies who represented the control group. The following parameters of ventricular function were assessed: left ventricular end diastolic volume, global and regional left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular telediastolic pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, the ratio between pulmonary flow and systemic flow (QP/QS). Group I patients showed higher values of left ventricular end diastolic pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure (16 +/- 0.6 mmHg; 33 +/- 1.5 mmHg) in relation to those of Group II (5.1 +/- 0.4 mmHg; 14 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and Group III (8.1 +/- 0.5 mmHg; 18 +/- 1.6 mmHg). In both cases the difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.001). A significant difference (p less than 0.05) was also noted in the incidence of mitral valve prolapse between patients in Group I and II. There was no significant difference (p = NS) however, between overall ejection fraction values in the three groups of patients; a lower regional ejection fraction (postero-basal segment) was recorded in Group I patients with mitral valve prolapse in comparison to patients in the other two groups (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为评估继发孔型房间隔缺损(ASD)成人及儿童的左心室功能,采用血流动力学和心血管造影技术对42例患者进行了检查。患者分为三组:第一组,18例ASD患者(平均年龄42岁);第二组,14例ASD患者(平均年龄9岁);第三组,10例无心脏病患者作为对照组。评估了以下心室功能参数:左心室舒张末期容积、左心室整体及局部射血分数、左心室舒张末压、平均肺动脉压、肺血流量与体循环血流量之比(QP/QS)。第一组患者的左心室舒张末压和平均肺动脉压值(16±0.6 mmHg;33±1.5 mmHg)高于第二组(5.1±0.4 mmHg;14±1.4 mmHg)和第三组(8.1±0.5 mmHg;18±1.6 mmHg)。两种情况下差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。第一组和第二组患者二尖瓣脱垂发生率也有显著差异(p<0.05)。然而,三组患者的总体射血分数值之间无显著差异(p = NS);与其他两组患者相比,第一组有二尖瓣脱垂的患者局部射血分数(后基底段)较低(p<0.05)。(摘要截短于250字)