Siefert Caleb J, Kehl-Fie Kendra, Blais Mark A, Chriki Lyvia
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):469-73. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.469.
The present studies focus on strategies for detecting back irrelevant responding (BIR) on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; L. C. Morey, 1991). Moderate BIR levels can greatly affect the clinical scales of the PAI. Further, the PAI's Inconsistency and Infrequency validity scales are less than optimal for detecting BIR. L. C. Morey and C. J. Hopwood (2004) developed an alternative strategy for detecting BIR that involves comparison of 2 scales from the PAI short-form with the same 2 scales from the PAI full-instrument. The present study examines how different BIR levels affect the clinical, treatment, and interpersonal scales of the PAI in 2 psychiatric inpatient samples. The effectiveness of various strategies for detecting BIR in an inpatient setting is also discussed. Consistent with previous research, moderate rates of BIR impacted several PAI scales in a meaningful way. The Inconsistency and Infrequency validity scales of the PAI were relatively ineffective for detecting low-to-moderate BIR levels. Conversely, the short-form full-instrument comparison strategy was much more sensitive to BIR. Finally, a new BIR detection indicator is presented that improves sensitivity rates for detecting all BIR levels in an acute setting. The implications of these results for detecting BIR in inpatient settings are discussed.
目前的研究聚焦于在《人格评估问卷》(PAI;L.C.莫雷,1991年)中检测反向无关反应(BIR)的策略。中等水平的BIR会极大地影响PAI的临床量表。此外,PAI的不一致性和低频效度量表在检测BIR方面并不理想。L.C.莫雷和C.J.霍普伍德(2004年)开发了一种检测BIR的替代策略,该策略涉及将PAI简版中的两个量表与PAI完整版中的相同两个量表进行比较。本研究考察了不同水平的BIR如何影响两个精神科住院患者样本中PAI的临床、治疗和人际量表。还讨论了在住院环境中检测BIR的各种策略的有效性。与先前的研究一致,中等程度的BIR发生率对几个PAI量表产生了有意义的影响。PAI的不一致性和低频效度量表在检测低到中等水平的BIR时相对无效。相反,简版与完整版比较策略对BIR更为敏感。最后,提出了一种新的BIR检测指标,该指标提高了在急性环境中检测所有BIR水平的敏感度。讨论了这些结果对在住院环境中检测BIR的意义。