Lee Jandee, Sung Tae-Yon, Nam Kee-Hyun, Chung Woung Youn, Soh Euy-Young, Park Cheong Soo
Department of Surgery, Ajou University College of Medicine, San 5, Wonchon-dong, Paldal-gu, Suwon 442-749, Republic of Korea.
World J Surg. 2008 May;32(5):716-21. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9381-z.
Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients show a high rate of cervical lymphatic metastasis. However, there are no universal binding guidelines for the extent of lateral cervical lymph node dissection (LND) in such cases. In particular, the need for LND above the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) remains controversial. The present study examined whether level IIb lymph node (LN) dissection is always necessary in PTC patients with lateral cervical LN metastasis.
The study prospectively examined 167 PTC patients with lateral cervical LN metastasis who underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND) in our institution from November 2005 to March 2007. The MRND was bilateral in 24 cases. All patients underwent level II, III, IV, and V LND. Levels IIa and IIb LNs were individually dissected in all cases. All LND was performed using strict leveling criteria by a single operating team. The patterns of lymphatic metastasis and potential risk factors for level IIb LN involvement were evaluated.
The most common site of metastasis was level III (80.6% of cases), followed by level IV (74.9%) and II (55.5%). The metastasis rates in level IIa and IIb were 55.5% and 6.8%, respectively; all level IIb LN metastasis was accompanied by level IIa metastasis (p=0.001). In addition, level IIb LN metastasis was found to be associated with the aggressiveness of lymphatic metastasis (i.e., the total number of metastatic LNs) (p<0.0001).
A level IIb LND should be performed when there is clinical or radiological evidence of lymphatic metastasis. In the absence of such evidence, the findings suggest that level IIb LND is not necessary in N1b PTC patients when there is no level IIa LN metastasis, or when the metastasis is not aggressive.
甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者颈部淋巴结转移率较高。然而,对于此类病例中侧颈淋巴结清扫术(LND)的范围,尚无通用的指导性标准。特别是,在副神经(SAN)上方进行LND的必要性仍存在争议。本研究探讨了在伴有侧颈淋巴结转移的PTC患者中,IIb区淋巴结清扫是否总是必要的。
本研究前瞻性地纳入了2005年11月至2007年3月期间在我院接受改良根治性颈清扫术(MRND)的167例伴有侧颈淋巴结转移的PTC患者。其中24例患者接受双侧MRND。所有患者均接受II、III、IV和V区LND。所有病例均分别对IIa区和IIb区淋巴结进行清扫。所有LND均由单一手术团队按照严格的分区标准进行。评估了淋巴结转移模式及IIb区淋巴结受累的潜在危险因素。
最常见的转移部位是III区(80.6%的病例),其次是IV区(74.9%)和II区(55.5%)。IIa区和IIb区的转移率分别为55.5%和6.8%;所有IIb区淋巴结转移均伴有IIa区转移(p = 0.001)。此外,发现IIb区淋巴结转移与淋巴结转移侵袭性(即转移淋巴结总数)相关(p < 0.0001)。
当有临床或影像学证据提示淋巴结转移时,应进行IIb区LND。在缺乏此类证据的情况下,研究结果表明,对于无IIa区淋巴结转移或转移不具侵袭性的N1b期PTC患者,无需进行IIb区LND。