Smith Stephen Matthew, Samani Nilesh J, Sammons Emily L, Rathbone Wendy E, Potter John F, Bentley Stephen, Panerai Ronney B
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
J Hypertens. 2008 Jan;26(1):76-82. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f06e9c.
To compare estimates of cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) obtained by the Finapres device and from the direct measurement of arterial blood pressure (ABP) values from the ascending aorta, using both spectral analysis and sequence analysis.
A cohort study of 45 coronary artery disease patients undergoing routine percutaneous coronary procedures.
Continuous supine recordings of resting ABP in the finger (Finapres), ascending aorta (Millar catheter-tip transducer) and electrocardiogram were obtained. Beat-to-beat values of systolic ABP (Finapres and aortic) and R-R interval were used to estimate the cardiac BRS from spontaneous sequences and by spectral analysis, using the alpha index for the low-frequency band (0.05-0.15 Hz). The influence of beta-blockers on BRS estimates was also investigated.
No significant difference was observed between estimates of BRS derived from the Finapres (BRSFIN) and aortic ABP (BRSAO) by the spectral analysis method (Finapres bias 0.30 +/- 2.52 ms/mmHg). For sequence analysis, BRSFIN was significantly higher than BRSAO (7.80 +/- 4.52 versus 6.44 +/- 3.46 ms/mmHg), but the bias (1.36 +/- 3.10 ms/mmHg) was not significantly different from spectral analysis. No significant differences in BRS were found between beta-blocker users (n = 24) and non-users (n = 10) for either the processing method or source of ABP recording.
Spectral analysis of cardiac BRS showed a better agreement between estimates obtained from the Finapres and aortic ABP.
使用频谱分析和序列分析方法,比较通过Finapres设备获得的心脏压力感受器敏感性(BRS)估计值与通过直接测量升主动脉动脉血压(ABP)值获得的估计值。
对45例接受常规经皮冠状动脉手术的冠心病患者进行队列研究。
连续记录静息状态下手指(Finapres)、升主动脉(Millar导管尖端换能器)的ABP以及心电图。使用收缩期ABP(Finapres和主动脉)的逐搏值和R-R间期,通过自发序列并使用低频带(0.05 - 0.15 Hz)的α指数进行频谱分析,来估计心脏BRS。还研究了β受体阻滞剂对BRS估计值的影响。
通过频谱分析方法,Finapres(BRSFIN)和主动脉ABP(BRSAO)得出的BRS估计值之间未观察到显著差异(Finapres偏差为0.30 +/- 2.52 ms/mmHg)。对于序列分析,BRSFIN显著高于BRSAO(7.80 +/- 4.52对6.44 +/- 3.46 ms/mmHg),但偏差(1.36 +/- 3.10 ms/mmHg)与频谱分析无显著差异。对于ABP记录的处理方法或来源,β受体阻滞剂使用者(n = 24)和非使用者(n = 10)之间的BRS均未发现显著差异。
心脏BRS的频谱分析显示,从Finapres和主动脉ABP获得的估计值之间具有更好的一致性。