Panerai R B, Sammons E L, Smith S M, Rathbone W E, Bentley S, Potter J F, Samani N J
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Physiol Meas. 2008 Apr;29(4):497-513. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/4/006. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
Temporal variability of parameters which describe dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA), usually quantified by the short-term relationship between arterial blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), could result from continuous adjustments in physiological regulatory mechanisms or could be the result of artefacts in methods of measurement, such as the use of non-invasive measurements of BP in the finger. In 27 subjects (61+/-11 years old) undergoing coronary artery angioplasty, BP was continuously recorded at rest with the Finapres device and in the ascending aorta (Millar catheter, BP(AO)), together with bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the middle cerebral artery, surface ECG and transcutaneous CO(2). Dynamic CA was expressed by the autoregulation index (ARI), ranging from 0 (absence of CA) to 9 (best CA). Time-varying, continuous estimates of ARI (ARI(t)) were obtained with an autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) model applied to a 60 s sliding data window. No significant differences were observed in the accuracy and precision of ARI(t) between estimates derived from the Finapres and BP(AO). Highly significant correlations were obtained between ARI(t) estimates from the right and left middle cerebral artery (MCA) (Finapres r=0.60+/-0.20; BP(AO) r=0.56+/-0.22) and also between the ARI(t) estimates from the Finapres and BP(AO) (right MCA r=0.70+/-0.22; left MCA r=0.74+/-0.22). Surrogate data showed that ARI(t) was highly sensitive to the presence of noise in the CBFV signal, with both the bias and dispersion of estimates increasing for lower values of ARI(t). This effect could explain the sudden drops of ARI(t) to zero as reported previously. Simulated sudden changes in ARI(t) can be detected by the Finapres, but the bias and variability of estimates also increase for lower values of ARI. In summary, the Finapres does not distort time-varying estimates of dynamic CA obtained with a sliding window combined with an ARMA model, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in healthy subjects and to assess the influence of different physiological manoeuvres.
描述动态脑自动调节(CA)的参数的时间变异性,通常通过动脉血压(BP)和脑血流速度(CBFV)之间的短期关系来量化,可能是生理调节机制持续调整的结果,也可能是测量方法中伪像的结果,例如使用手指无创测量血压。在27名接受冠状动脉血管成形术的受试者(61±11岁)中,使用Finapres设备在静息状态下连续记录血压,并在升主动脉(Millar导管,BP(AO))处记录,同时记录双侧大脑中动脉的经颅多普勒超声、体表心电图和经皮二氧化碳。动态CA用自动调节指数(ARI)表示,范围从0(无CA)到9(最佳CA)。通过将自回归移动平均(ARMA)模型应用于60秒滑动数据窗口,获得ARI随时间变化的连续估计值(ARI(t))。在从Finapres和BP(AO)得出的估计值之间,未观察到ARI(t)的准确性和精确性有显著差异。从右侧和左侧大脑中动脉(MCA)得出的ARI(t)估计值之间获得了高度显著的相关性(Finapres时r = 0.60±0.20;BP(AO)时r = 0.56±0.22),并且在从Finapres和BP(AO)得出的ARI(t)估计值之间也有相关性(右侧MCA时r = 0.70±0.22;左侧MCA时r = 0.74±0.22)。替代数据表明,ARI(t)对CBFV信号中的噪声高度敏感,随着ARI(t)值降低,估计值的偏差和离散度都会增加。这种效应可以解释先前报道的ARI(t)突然降至零的情况。Finapres可以检测到ARI(t)的模拟突然变化,但对于较低的ARI值,估计值的偏差和变异性也会增加。总之,Finapres不会扭曲通过滑动窗口结合ARMA模型获得的动态CA随时间变化的估计值,但需要进一步研究以在健康受试者中证实这些发现,并评估不同生理操作的影响。