Zucchelli G C, Pilo A, Malvano R, Signorini C, Bolelli G F, Albertini A
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica, CNR, Pisa.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1991;27(3):479-86.
External quality assessment (EQA) programs run by CNR/Tecnostandard for immunoassays of hormones and tumor markers, started in 1980, presently include as many as 20 analytes; about 300 laboratories are involved in these programs. For all immunoassays submitted to the EQA, the inspection of cumulative results allows the current situation to be documented for total variability and its within-kit and between-kit components (the former accounting for the reproducibility and robustness of the kits and the latter for their systematic differences of estimation). For 13 assays subjected to EQA for longer, the variability trends over time are depicted, and single factors affecting the overall quality of particular assays are identified. Among these, experimental simplification of kit structure, alignment of calibrators with an acknowledged reference material, and adoption of monoclonal-antibody based two-sites assays can be mentioned. On the contrary, neither automation of the procedures nor (more expectedly) increasing use of nonisotopic techniques has proved effective in significantly improving the analytical quality.
由CNR/Tecnostandard开展的激素和肿瘤标志物免疫分析外部质量评估(EQA)项目始于1980年,目前涵盖多达20种分析物;约300家实验室参与了这些项目。对于所有提交给EQA的免疫分析,对累积结果的检查可以记录当前总变异性及其试剂盒内和试剂盒间组分的情况(前者反映试剂盒的重复性和稳健性,后者反映其估计的系统差异)。对于13项接受EQA时间更长的分析,描绘了随时间的变异性趋势,并确定了影响特定分析总体质量 的单一因素。其中,可以提及试剂盒结构的实验简化、校准物与公认参考物质的比对以及采用基于单克隆抗体的双位点分析。相反,程序自动化以及(更预期的)非同位素技术使用的增加均未被证明能有效显著提高分析质量。