Demling Robert H, Waterhouse Barbara
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Burn and Trauma Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Burns Wounds. 2007 Nov 16;7:e8.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a leading cause of colonization and infection in both acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds.
Our objective is to define this current epidemic problem caused by both community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) and hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA), focusing on the similarities and differences between these 2 isolates as well as the impact on wound management decisions.
Methods used include a literature review on the growth of the current MRSA problem and its International scope. In addition, a current up-to-date assessment had been made of the problem and the current approach to management of MRSA in acute soft-tissue and chronic wounds. Burns are not discussed because this injury usually does not fit either categories and is managed quite uniquely.
Results included the following: (1) There are very distinct properties of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, which must be considered for acute and chronic wound care. Management of both requires rigorous barrier precaution techniques to avoid cross-contamination. The presence of MRSA as a carrier state increases the risk of both a systemic and local wound infection in the carrier. There are large and increasing reservoirs of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA worldwide leading to more bacteremias and wound problems. Topical antimicrobial therapy has not been addressed in managing MRSA in acute and chronic wounds.
Conclusions include the fact that both HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA wound infections are rapidly increasing, especially with CA-MRSA. This high incidence requires appropriate wound prediction and management decisions as well as attempts to avoid further cross-contamination and reservoir growth. Topical antimicrobial therapy would seem to be an important component in controlling this tremendous problem. Yet this topic has yet to be adequately addressed.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)已成为急性和慢性软组织伤口定植和感染的主要原因。
我们的目的是界定由社区获得性MRSA(CA-MRSA)和医院获得性MRSA(HA-MRSA)引起的当前流行问题,重点关注这两种菌株之间的异同以及对伤口管理决策的影响。
使用的方法包括对当前MRSA问题的发展及其国际范围进行文献综述。此外,对急性软组织和慢性伤口中MRSA问题及当前管理方法进行了最新评估。烧伤不在讨论范围内,因为这种损伤通常不属于这两类,且管理方式非常独特。
结果如下:(1)CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA有非常明显的特性,在急性和慢性伤口护理中必须予以考虑。对两者的管理都需要严格的屏障预防技术以避免交叉污染。MRSA作为携带状态的存在会增加携带者发生全身和局部伤口感染的风险。全球范围内CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA的储存库庞大且不断增加,导致更多的菌血症和伤口问题。在急性和慢性伤口中管理MRSA时,尚未涉及局部抗菌治疗。
结论包括HA-MRSA和CA-MRSA伤口感染都在迅速增加,尤其是CA-MRSA。这种高发病率需要做出适当的伤口预测和管理决策,并努力避免进一步的交叉污染和储存库扩大。局部抗菌治疗似乎是控制这一重大问题的重要组成部分。然而,这一主题尚未得到充分探讨。