Seymour Ian J, Casadei Silvia, Zampiga Valentina, Rosato Simonetta, Danesi Rita, Scarpi Emanuela, Falcini Fabio, Strada Miria, Morini Nori, Naldoni Carlo, Amadori Dino, Calistri Daniele
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, FC, Italy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Nov;112(2):343-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9846-7. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
BRCA1/2 mutation status is of paramount importance to identify families at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC). Most HBOC and BRCA1/2 mutation studies have focused on highly selected sub-populations, and few data are available for large population cohorts. For this reason, as part of a regional cancer prevention strategy in North-Central Italy, we set up a population-based screening programme to identify all resident HBOC families, and to determine their BRCA1/2 mutation status. To date, 44 different BRCA1/2 variants have been identified in 55 HBOC families. Of the seven newly reported mutations, only BRCA1 Q284X is clearly deleterious. The analysis of clinical disease characteristics in relation to age of disease onset and family history showed a difference between BRCA1/2 wild type and mutation carrier families. Interestingly, BRCA1/2 mutations were significantly more common in women who developed breast cancer <or=40 years of age than in BRCA1/2 wild type women (50% vs. 29%, respectively, P = 0.005). The family history selection criteria most likely to indicate the presence of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations are breast cancer <or=35 years (P = 0.012), two first-degree relatives with breast cancer <or=50 years (P = 0.022), and male breast cancer (P = 0.047). The penetrance of BRCA1/2 alterations in our cohort seems to be aligned with other published results. However, new data interpretations have emerged in relation to the clinical criteria and the presence of deleterious mutations. This information shows that a correct and accurate clinical selection could avoid unnecessary molecular tests and could better address genetic analysis and clinical management.
BRCA1/2突变状态对于识别有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)风险的家族至关重要。大多数HBOC和BRCA1/2突变研究都集中在高度选择的亚人群上,针对大型人群队列的数据很少。因此,作为意大利中北部地区癌症预防策略的一部分,我们开展了一项基于人群的筛查计划,以识别所有当地的HBOC家族,并确定他们的BRCA1/2突变状态。迄今为止,在55个HBOC家族中已鉴定出44种不同的BRCA1/2变体。在新报告的7种突变中,只有BRCA1 Q284X明显有害。对与发病年龄和家族史相关的临床疾病特征进行分析后发现,BRCA1/2野生型家族和突变携带者家族之间存在差异。有趣的是,与BRCA1/2野生型女性相比,40岁及以下患乳腺癌的女性中BRCA1/2突变明显更常见(分别为50%和29%,P = 0.005)。最有可能表明存在有害BRCA1/2突变的家族史选择标准是35岁及以下患乳腺癌(P = 0.012)、两名50岁及以下的一级亲属患乳腺癌(P = 0.022)以及男性乳腺癌(P = 0.047)。我们队列中BRCA1/2改变的外显率似乎与其他已发表的结果一致。然而,关于临床标准和有害突变的存在出现了新的数据解读。这些信息表明,正确而准确的临床选择可以避免不必要的分子检测,并能更好地指导基因分析和临床管理。