Lidicker William Z
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 Feb;83(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00032.x. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
Viewing the universe as being composed of hierarchically arranged systems is widely accepted as a useful model of reality. In ecology, three levels of organization are generally recognized: organisms, populations, and communities (biocoenoses). For half a century increasing numbers of ecologists have concluded that recognition of a fourth level would facilitate increased understanding of ecological phenomena. Sometimes the word "ecosystem" is used for this level, but this is arguably inappropriate. Since 1986, I and others have argued that the term "landscape" would be a suitable term for a level of organization defined as an ecological system containing more than one community type. However, "landscape" and "landscape level" continue to be used extensively by ecologists in the popular sense of a large expanse of space. I therefore now propose that the term "ecoscape" be used instead for this fourth level of organization. A clearly defined fourth level for ecology would focus attention on the emergent properties of this level, and maintain the spatial and temporal scale-free nature inherent in this hierarchy of organizational levels for living entities.
将宇宙视为由层次结构排列的系统组成,这一观点被广泛接受为一种有用的现实模型。在生态学中,通常认可三个组织层次:生物体、种群和群落(生物群落)。半个世纪以来,越来越多的生态学家得出结论,认识到第四个层次将有助于增进对生态现象的理解。有时“生态系统”一词用于这个层次,但这可能并不恰当。自1986年以来,我和其他人一直认为,“景观”一词将是一个适合用于定义为包含不止一种群落类型的生态系统的组织层次的术语。然而,“景观”和“景观层次”在生态学家中仍然广泛用于大片空间的通俗意义。因此,我现在提议用“生态景”一词来代替这个第四个组织层次。为生态学明确界定第四个层次将把注意力集中在这个层次的涌现特性上,并保持生命实体组织层次等级中固有的时空无标度性质。