Suppr超能文献

选择伏立康唑对念珠菌属进行初始药敏试验的替代药物(氟康唑或伏立康唑):一项全球抗真菌监测计划的结果

Selection of a surrogate agent (fluconazole or voriconazole) for initial susceptibility testing of posaconazole against Candida spp.: results from a global antifungal surveillance program.

作者信息

Pfaller M A, Messer S A, Boyken L, Tendolkar S, Hollis R J, Diekema D J

机构信息

Medical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):551-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01952-07. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

Abstract

There are currently no FDA-approved broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing products or interpretive breakpoints for susceptibility testing of the new triazole posaconazole. Fluconazole and voriconazole are in the same triazole class as posaconazole, have CLSI-approved interpretive MIC breakpoints, and are available on some commercially available MIC panels. We investigated whether one or both of these agents may be useful as a surrogate marker for posaconazole susceptibility. Fluconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole MIC results for 10,807 isolates of Candida spp. were analyzed to validate a potential surrogate marker for posaconazole activity against indicated species. For illustrative purposes, we applied the voriconazole MIC breakpoints to posaconazole (susceptible, < or =1 microg/ml; susceptible dose dependent, 2 microg/ml; resistant, > or =4 microg/ml) and compared these MIC results and categorical interpretations with those of fluconazole and voriconazole by using regression statistics and categorical agreement. For all 10,807 isolates, the absolute categorical agreement was 91.1% (0.1% very major errors [VME], 1.2% major errors [ME], and 7.6% minor errors [M]) using fluconazole as the surrogate marker and 97.7% (0.3% VME 0.1% ME, and 1.9% M) using voriconazole as the surrogate. The results with fluconazole improved to a categorical agreement of 93.7% (0.1% VME, 0.2% ME, and 6.0% M) when results for Candida krusei (not indicated for fluconazole testing) were omitted. Either fluconazole or voriconazole MIC results may serve as surrogate markers to predict the susceptibility of Candida spp. to posaconazole.

摘要

目前尚无美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的用于新型三唑类药物泊沙康唑药敏试验的肉汤微量稀释抗真菌药敏试验产品或药敏判读标准。氟康唑和伏立康唑与泊沙康唑属于同一三唑类,有临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)批准的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)判读标准,且在一些市售的MIC检测板上可用。我们研究了这两种药物中的一种或两种是否可用作泊沙康唑药敏的替代标志物。分析了10807株念珠菌属菌株的氟康唑、伏立康唑和泊沙康唑MIC结果,以验证针对指定菌种的泊沙康唑活性的潜在替代标志物。为便于说明,我们将伏立康唑的MIC判读标准应用于泊沙康唑(敏感,≤1μg/ml;剂量依赖性敏感,2μg/ml;耐药,≥4μg/ml),并通过回归统计和分类一致性将这些MIC结果及分类判读与氟康唑和伏立康唑的结果进行比较。对于所有10807株菌株,以氟康唑作为替代标志物时,绝对分类一致性为91.1%(0.1%极重大错误[VME],1.2%重大错误[ME],7.6%微小错误[M]),以伏立康唑作为替代标志物时为97.7%(0.3% VME,0.1% ME,1.9% M)。当剔除克鲁斯念珠菌(未指明用于氟康唑检测)的结果后,氟康唑的结果分类一致性提高到93.7%(0.1% VME,0.2% ME,6.0% M)。氟康唑或伏立康唑的MIC结果均可作为预测念珠菌属对泊沙康唑药敏性的替代标志物。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Cysteine-Rich Antifungal Proteins from Filamentous Fungi are Promising Bioactive Natural Compounds in Anti- Therapy.
Isr J Chem. 2019 May;59(5):360-370. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201800168. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
2
Parallel and cross-resistances of clinical yeast isolates determined by susceptibility pattern analysis.
GMS Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 7;4:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/id000020. eCollection 2016.
3
Activity of Combined Antifungal Agents Against Multidrug-Resistant Candida glabrata Strains.
Mycopathologia. 2017 Oct;182(9-10):819-828. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0141-9. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Oral Candida Isolates from Patients Suffering from Caries and Chronic Periodontitis.
Mycopathologia. 2017 Jun;182(5-6):471-485. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0112-1. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
In Vitro Susceptibilities of Candida albicans Isolates to Antifungal Agents in Tokat, Turkey.
Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015 Sep 8;8(9):e28057. doi: 10.5812/jjm.28057. eCollection 2015 Sep.
7
Advances in the treatment of invasive neonatal candidiasis.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 May;16(7):1035-48. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1031108. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
10
Impact of new antifungal breakpoints on antifungal resistance in Candida species.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):994-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03044-13. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

3
Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):348-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094.
4
Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):335-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061098.
5
6
Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Jan;20(1):133-63. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00029-06.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验