Pfaller M A, Messer S A, Boyken L, Rice C, Tendolkar S, Hollis R J, Diekema D J
Department of Pathology, Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jul;42(7):3137-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3137-3141.2004.
Cross-resistance within a class of antimicrobial agents is a problem that is often encountered with antibacterial agents, and it is also an issue with antifungal agents. A current example is ravuconazole, a new triazole antifungal with an expanded spectrum and potency against Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and other opportunistic fungal pathogens. The present study addresses the issue of cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole and the use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida spp. to ravuconazole. Reference broth microdilution MIC results for 12,796 strains of Candida spp. isolated from more than 200 medical centers worldwide were used. Ravuconazole MICs and tentative interpretive categories (susceptible, </=1 microg/ml; resistant, >/=2 microg/ml) were compared with those of fluconazole by using regression statistics and error rate bounding analyses. For all 12,796 isolates, the absolute categorical agreement rate was 92.5% (rate of false-susceptible results, or very major errors [VME], 0.1%). Ravuconazole was active (MIC, </=1 microg/ml) against 99.9% of the fluconazole-susceptible isolates, 96% of the fluconazole-susceptible dose-dependent isolates, and 49% of the fluconazole-resistant isolates, including 99% of the Candida krusei isolates. Since ravuconazole is 16- to 32-fold more potent than fluconazole, the performance of fluconazole as a surrogate marker for ravuconazole susceptibility was improved by designating those isolates with fluconazole MICs of </=32 microg/ml susceptible to ravuconazole, resulting in a categorical agreement rate of 98.3%, with a VME rate of 0.3% (99 and 0.4%, respectively, when C. krusei was omitted). Cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole applies most directly to fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata and is variable among other species of Candida. Fluconazole may serve as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida spp. to ravuconazole.
同一类抗菌药物之间的交叉耐药性是抗菌药物中经常遇到的问题,在抗真菌药物中也是一个问题。当前的一个例子是雷夫康唑,一种新型三唑类抗真菌药物,对念珠菌属、曲霉属及其他机会性真菌病原体具有更广的抗菌谱和更强的抗菌活性。本研究探讨了氟康唑与雷夫康唑之间的交叉耐药性问题,以及使用氟康唑作为替代指标来预测念珠菌属对雷夫康唑敏感性的情况。研究使用了从全球200多个医疗中心分离出的12796株念珠菌属菌株的参考肉汤微量稀释法MIC结果。通过回归统计和错误率边界分析,将雷夫康唑的MIC和初步解释类别(敏感,≤1μg/ml;耐药,≥2μg/ml)与氟康唑的进行了比较。对于所有12796株分离株,绝对分类一致率为92.5%(假敏感结果率,即非常重大错误[VME]率,为0.1%)。雷夫康唑对99.9%的氟康唑敏感分离株、96%的氟康唑敏感剂量依赖性分离株以及49%的氟康唑耐药分离株有活性,其中包括99%的克柔念珠菌分离株。由于雷夫康唑的效力比氟康唑高16至32倍,通过将氟康唑MIC≤32μg/ml的分离株指定为对雷夫康唑敏感,氟康唑作为雷夫康唑敏感性替代指标的性能得到了改善,分类一致率达到98.3%,VME率为0.3%(排除克柔念珠菌时分别为99%和0.4%)。氟康唑与雷夫康唑之间的交叉耐药性最直接适用于对氟康唑耐药的光滑念珠菌,在其他念珠菌属中则有所不同。氟康唑可作为预测念珠菌属对雷夫康唑敏感性的替代指标。