Gowen E, Stanley J, Miall R C
Faculty of Life Sciences, Moffat Building, The University of Manchester, P.O. Box 88, Sackville Street, Manchester M60 1QD, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Mar 7;46(4):1060-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
Movement interference occurs when concurrently observing and executing incompatible actions and is believed to be due to co-activation of conflicting populations of mirror neurons. It has also been suggested that mirror neurons contribute towards the imitation of observed actions. However, the exact neural substrate of imitation may depend on task demands: a processing route for goal-directed meaningful actions may be distinct from one for non-goal-directed actions. A more controversial role proposed for these neurons is in theory of mind processing, along with the subsequent suggestion that impairment in the mirror neuron circuit can contribute to autism-spectrum disorder (ASD) where individuals have theory of mind deficits. We have therefore examined movement interference in nine ASD participants and nine matched controls while performing actions congruent and incongruent with observed meaningless arm movements. We hypothesised that if the mirror neuron system was impaired, reduced interference should be observed in the ASD group. However, control and ASD participants demonstrated an equivalent interference effect in an interpersonal condition, with greater movement variability in the incongruent compared to the congruent condition. A component of movement interference which is independent of congruency did differ between groups: ASD participants made generally more variable movements for the interpersonal task than for biological dot-motion task, while the reverse was true for the control participants. We interpret these results as evidence that the ASD participant group either rely to a greater extent on the goal-directed imitation pathway, supporting claims that they have a specific deficit of the non-goal-directed imitation pathway, or exhibit reduced visuomotor integration.
当同时观察和执行不相容动作时会出现动作干扰,人们认为这是由于相互冲突的镜像神经元群体共同激活所致。也有人提出,镜像神经元有助于对观察到的动作进行模仿。然而,模仿的确切神经基础可能取决于任务需求:目标导向的有意义动作的处理路径可能与非目标导向动作的处理路径不同。针对这些神经元提出的一个更具争议性的作用是在心理理论加工方面,随后有人提出镜像神经元回路受损可能导致自闭症谱系障碍(ASD),患有这种疾病的个体存在心理理论缺陷。因此,我们对9名自闭症谱系障碍参与者和9名匹配的对照组进行了测试,观察他们在执行与观察到的无意义手臂动作一致和不一致的动作时的动作干扰情况。我们假设,如果镜像神经元系统受损,那么在自闭症谱系障碍组中应该会观察到干扰减少。然而,在人际情境中,对照组和自闭症谱系障碍参与者表现出了同等的干扰效应,与一致情境相比,不一致情境下的动作变异性更大。两组之间存在一个与一致性无关的动作干扰成分差异:自闭症谱系障碍参与者在人际任务中的动作总体上比在生物点运动任务中的动作变异性更大,而对照组参与者则相反。我们将这些结果解释为证据,表明自闭症谱系障碍参与者组要么在更大程度上依赖目标导向的模仿路径,支持了他们在非目标导向模仿路径方面存在特定缺陷的说法,要么表现出视觉运动整合能力下降。