Vazquez Xoan Miguens, Rodriguez Maria Sol, Peñaranda Jose Manuel Suarez, Concheiro Luis, Barus Jose Ignacio Muñoz
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Monforte Hospital, Corredoira s/n 27400 Monforte de Lemos, Lugo, Spain.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2008 Jan;15(1):20-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
Disability following traumatic spine injury often requires assessment for judicial reasons.
To determine the optimum time to carry out a medico-legal evaluation.
Retrospective study (1995-2000) of patients with traumatic spine injury with a follow-up of five years. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale was used to determine level and extent of the injury. Statistical analysis by SPSS 11.0.
173 injuries were analyzed (39.3% ASIA A; 15.6% ASIA B; 29.47% ASIA C; 15.6% ASIA D). Neurological improvement was detected in 35.83%, more frequently in incomplete injuries. ASIA A injuries remained mainly complete from admission to discharge and in no case reached functional levels. Only a third of ASIA B patients showed improvement, of whom 33.3% were functional. Improvement in ASIA C patients was 76.4%, these and all ASIA D patients were functional on discharge. The condition a year after the injury remained unchanged in all cases, regardless of the extent of injury. Patients who showed improvement did so early on, mainly during hospitalization.
The optimum time for evaluation of spinal cord injury for medicolegal purposes is at one year after the injury. In cases of complete injury, evaluation can be carried out on discharge with no need to wait for one year.
创伤性脊柱损伤后的残疾情况常因司法原因需要进行评估。
确定进行法医学评估的最佳时间。
对1995年至2000年创伤性脊柱损伤患者进行回顾性研究,随访五年。采用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)量表确定损伤的水平和程度。使用SPSS 11.0进行统计分析。
分析了173例损伤(ASIA A占39.3%;ASIA B占15.6%;ASIA C占29.47%;ASIA D占15.6%)。35.83%的患者出现神经功能改善,不完全损伤患者中更为常见。ASIA A损伤从入院到出院主要仍为完全性损伤,无一例达到功能水平。只有三分之一的ASIA B患者有改善,其中33.3%恢复了功能。ASIA C患者的改善率为76.4%,这些患者以及所有ASIA D患者出院时均恢复了功能。无论损伤程度如何,所有患者伤后一年的情况均无变化。出现改善的患者在早期,主要是住院期间就已改善。
出于法医学目的,评估脊髓损伤的最佳时间是伤后一年。对于完全性损伤的病例,可在出院时进行评估,无需等待一年。