Cannito M P
Department of Speech Communication, University of Texas, Austin.
J Commun Disord. 1991 Oct-Dec;24(5-6):313-29. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(91)90006-5.
Whereas recent research has focused upon neuromotor aspects of spasmodic dysphonia, the disorder has historically been regarded as having a psychogenic basis. Relatively little empirical evidence, however, has been offered either to support or refute that claim. The present study examines emotional characteristics of 18 female spasmodic dysphonic subjects in comparison to matched normal controls across psychometric measures of depression, anxiety, and somatic complaints. Statistically significant differences were noted between groups for all measures and over half of the dysphonic subjects exhibited clinically significant levels of depression and anxiety relative to published test norms. Correlational analysis revealed the presence of an "affective factor" among the dysphonics that was not evident among the controls. These findings raise serious concerns for neuromotor interpretations given in various areas of recent spasmodic dysphonia research. Theoretical, clinical and methodological implications are discussed.
尽管最近的研究集中在痉挛性发声障碍的神经运动方面,但从历史上看,这种疾病一直被认为有心理根源。然而,相对较少的实证证据被用来支持或反驳这一说法。本研究通过对抑郁、焦虑和躯体不适的心理测量指标,比较了18名女性痉挛性发声障碍患者与匹配的正常对照组的情绪特征。所有测量指标在两组之间均存在统计学上的显著差异,超过半数的发声障碍患者相对于已发表的测试标准表现出临床上显著的抑郁和焦虑水平。相关分析显示,发声障碍患者中存在一种“情感因素”,而在对照组中并不明显。这些发现引发了对近期痉挛性发声障碍研究各领域中神经运动解释的严重担忧。文中讨论了理论、临床和方法学方面的意义。