• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后尿流改道对吻合口狭窄形成的影响。

The impact of urinary drainage on the development of anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

作者信息

Yildirim Asif, Basok Erem Kaan, Ilhan Ali Ihsan, Basaran Adnan, Rifaioglu Mehmet Murat, Tokuc Resit

机构信息

Department of Urology, SB Istanbul Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(3):667-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9309-4. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-007-9309-4
PMID:18097770
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Anastomotic stricture (AS) is a well-described complication of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) despite all the refinements in surgical technique. We aimed to define and discuss the role of postoperative urinary drainage on AS development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 136 patients with localized prostate carcinoma underwent RRP. In all patients, urethral catheter was removed 3 weeks after RRP without a cystogram. We documented duration of drainage (<3 days, n=86; 3-5 days, n=36; and >5 days, n=14), volume of drainage (<300 ml, n=78; 300-500 ml, n=27; and >500 ml, n=31), and mean volume of drainage per day (<100 ml, n=85 and >100 ml, n=51), continence status, and clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients as risk factors related with AS.

RESULTS

AS was diagnosed in 28.6% of patients. The rate was found to be 35.9%, 41%, and 23.1%, consistent with duration, and 38.4%, 15.4%, and 46.2% according to volume of drainage, respectively (P=0.0001). AS occurred in 43.6% and 56.4% of patients concerning mean volume of drainage per day, respectively (P=0.007). Analysis showed that AS was significantly associated with duration (>3 days), total volume (>500 ml), and the mean volume (>100 ml) of urinary drainage among the variables. The rates of urinary incontinence were 30.7% in patients with AS and 6.2% in patients without AS.

CONCLUSIONS

Time and the amount of urinary drainage were significantly associated with stricture formation following RRP that might be caused by partial disruption of the anastomosis.

摘要

目的

尽管手术技术不断改进,但吻合口狭窄(AS)仍是耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)一种广为人知的并发症。我们旨在明确并讨论术后尿液引流在AS发生中的作用。

患者与方法

共有136例局限性前列腺癌患者接受了RRP手术。所有患者在RRP术后3周拔除尿道导管,未进行膀胱造影。我们记录了引流持续时间(<3天,n = 86;3 - 5天,n = 36;>5天,n = 14)、引流量(<300 ml,n = 78;300 - 500 ml,n = 27;>500 ml,n = 31)、每日平均引流量(<100 ml,n = 85;>100 ml,n = 51)、控尿状态以及患者的临床和组织病理学特征,将其作为与AS相关的危险因素。

结果

28.6%的患者被诊断为AS。根据引流持续时间,该发生率分别为35.9%、41%和23.1%;根据引流量,分别为38.4%、15.4%和46.2%(P = 0.0001)。根据每日平均引流量,AS分别发生在43.6%和56.4%的患者中(P = 0.007)。分析表明,在这些变量中,AS与引流持续时间(>3天)、总引流量(>500 ml)和每日平均引流量(>100 ml)显著相关。AS患者的尿失禁发生率为30.7%,无AS患者为6.2%。

结论

RRP术后狭窄形成与尿液引流的时间和量显著相关,这可能是由于吻合口部分破裂所致。

相似文献

1
The impact of urinary drainage on the development of anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后尿流改道对吻合口狭窄形成的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(3):667-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9309-4. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
2
[Anastomotic stricture following radical retropubic prostatectomy: insights into incidence, management and factors predisposing for occurrence].耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄:对发病率、管理及发生易患因素的见解
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2012 Jul;103(4):604-9. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.103.604.
3
The impact of urinary extravasation after radical retropubic prostatectomy on urinary incontinence and anastomotic strictures.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后尿外渗对尿失禁和吻合口狭窄的影响。
Eur Urol. 1999 Sep;36(3):187-90. doi: 10.1159/000067995.
4
Evaluation of cold knife urethrotomy for the treatment of anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄的冷刀尿道切开术治疗效果评估
J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1545-8.
5
Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.经会阴根治性前列腺切除术和经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术吻合口狭窄的单中心比较。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):417-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
6
Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后早期拔除导尿管的安全性及结果
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):513-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.042.
7
Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy.影响根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄发展的因素。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2009 Dec;41(4):881-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-008-9519-4. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
8
Outcomes with an alternative anastomotic technique after radical retropubic prostatectomy: 10-year experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后采用另一种吻合技术的疗效:10年经验
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):132-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.024. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.改良横纹肌括约肌重建对机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期控尿功能恢复和吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness evaluation of open reanastomosis for obliterative or recalcitrant anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄的开放性再吻合术的安全性和有效性评估。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):253-261. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0681.
2
The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation.开放性根治性前列腺切除术中膀胱颈黏膜外翻对膀胱颈狭窄和尿外渗的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Oct;44(5):1403-10. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0186-0. Epub 2012 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases.机器人根治性前列腺切除术:500例病例的结果
BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1109-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06762.x.
2
Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁:根据定义的发生率、危险因素及长期随访的大型队列研究中的时间趋势
BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1234-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06185.x.
3
Factors predisposing to the development of anastomotic strictures in a single-surgeon series of radical retropubic prostatectomies.
在单名外科医生开展的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术系列中,导致吻合口狭窄发生的相关因素。
BJU Int. 2006 Feb;97(2):255-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05908.x.
4
Postoperative blood loss predicts the development of urinary extravasation on cystogram following radical retropubic prostatectomy.术后失血量可预测耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后膀胱造影时尿外渗的发生。
J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):146-50; discussion 150. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00051-0.
5
Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术与经腹根治性前列腺切除术及开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的发病率比较
Eur Urol. 2005 Jul;48(1):83-9; discussion 89. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.026. Epub 2005 Apr 12.
6
Bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后膀胱颈挛缩
BJU Int. 2004 Dec;94(9):1245-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05151.x.
7
Early catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后3天早期拔除导尿管。
Int J Urol. 2004 Nov;11(11):983-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00935.x.
8
Erectile and urinary dysfunction after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in Quebec: a population-based study of 2415 men.魁北克前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的勃起功能障碍和排尿功能障碍:一项对2415名男性的基于人群的研究。
Eur Urol. 2004 Aug;46(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.020.
9
Can leakage at the vesico-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy?
BJU Int. 2004 Mar;93(4):503-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04668.x.
10
Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术术后的长期无生化疾病生存及癌症特异性生存。约翰霍普金斯医院15年的经验。
Urol Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;28(3):555-65. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70163-4.