• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与异性恋男性和女性相比,同性恋男性的认知概况。

A cognitive profile of homosexual men compared to heterosexual men and women.

作者信息

McCormick C M, Witelson S F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1991;16(6):459-73. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(91)90030-w.

DOI:10.1016/0306-4530(91)90030-w
PMID:1811244
Abstract

Matched groups of homosexual men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women (n = 38 per group) were tested on three measures of spatial ability and two measures of fluency that typically reveal sex differences. For the three spatial tests and one of the fluency tests, the mean performance of homosexual men fell between those of the heterosexual men and women. The pattern of cognitive skills of homosexual men was different from that of heterosexual men: homosexual men had lower spatial ability relative to fluency. The cognitive pattern of homosexual men was not significantly different from that of heterosexual women. In addition, the results suggest that homosexual men classified on the basis of hand preference may form two subgroups that differ in cognitive pattern. These findings are compatible with the hypothesis that there is a neurobiological factor related to sexual differentiation in the etiology of homosexuality.

摘要

对匹配的男同性恋者、异性恋男性和异性恋女性组(每组n = 38)进行了三项空间能力测试和两项通常显示性别差异的流畅性测试。在三项空间测试和一项流畅性测试中,男同性恋者的平均表现介于异性恋男性和女性之间。男同性恋者的认知技能模式与异性恋男性不同:相对于流畅性,男同性恋者的空间能力较低。男同性恋者的认知模式与异性恋女性没有显著差异。此外,结果表明,根据用手偏好分类的男同性恋者可能形成两个认知模式不同的亚组。这些发现与以下假设相符:在同性恋病因中存在与性别分化相关的神经生物学因素。

相似文献

1
A cognitive profile of homosexual men compared to heterosexual men and women.与异性恋男性和女性相比,同性恋男性的认知概况。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1991;16(6):459-73. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(91)90030-w.
2
Sexual Orientation and Cognitive Ability: A Multivariate Meta-Analytic Follow-Up.性取向与认知能力:多元变量荟萃分析后续研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01632-y. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
Sexual orientation and neurocognitive ability: A meta-analysis in men and women.性取向与神经认知能力:男性和女性的荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Dec;83:691-696. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
4
Brain differentiation and preferred partner characteristics in heterosexual and homosexual men and women.异性恋和同性恋男性及女性的大脑分化与偏好伴侣特征
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Aug;25(4):297-301.
5
Developmental instability is associated with neurocognitive performance in heterosexual and homosexual men, but not in women.发育不稳定性与异性恋和同性恋男性的神经认知表现有关,但与女性无关。
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Feb;118(1):243-7. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.1.243.
6
Performance differences between adult heterosexual and homosexual men on the Digit-Symbol Substitution subtest of the WAIS-R.成人异性恋男性与同性恋男性在韦氏成人智力量表修订版数字符号替换分测验中的表现差异。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb;26(1):141-8. doi: 10.1076/jcen.26.1.141.23934.
7
Sexual orientation and spatial position effects on selective forms of object location memory.性取向和空间位置对选择性物体位置记忆形式的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2011 Apr;75(3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11.010. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
8
Sexual partner age preferences of homosexual and heterosexual men and women.同性恋和异性恋男性及女性对性伴侣年龄的偏好。
Arch Sex Behav. 2000 Feb;29(1):67-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1001886521449.
9
Sexual orientation and cognitive abilities.性取向与认知能力。
Arch Sex Behav. 1991 Jun;20(3):307-18. doi: 10.1007/BF01541849.
10
Haemodynamic brain response to visual sexual stimuli is different between homosexual and heterosexual men.同性恋男性和异性恋男性对视觉性刺激的血流动力学脑反应有所不同。
J Int Med Res. 2011;39(1):199-211. doi: 10.1177/147323001103900121.

引用本文的文献

1
The Desirable Dad Hypothesis: Male Same-Sex Attraction as the Product of Selection for Paternal Care via Antagonistic Pleiotropy.理想父亲假说:通过拮抗多效性选择父性关怀的男性同性吸引。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 May;53(5):1731-1745. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02780-7. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Male sexual orientation, gender nonconformity, and neural activity during mental rotations: an fMRI study.男性性取向、性别不一致与心理旋转任务中的神经活动:一项 fMRI 研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 30;10(1):18709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74886-0.
3
Executive function and its relation to anatomical connectome in homosexual and heterosexual men.
同性恋和异性恋男性的执行功能及其与解剖连接组的关系。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Oct;10(10):1973-1983. doi: 10.21037/qims-19-821b.
4
Sexual Orientation and Cognitive Ability: A Multivariate Meta-Analytic Follow-Up.性取向与认知能力:多元变量荟萃分析后续研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01632-y. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Sexual Orientation-Related Differences in Virtual Spatial Navigation and Spatial Search Strategies.虚拟空间导航与空间搜索策略中与性取向相关的差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jul;46(5):1279-1294. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0986-5. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Olfactory performance is predicted by individual sex-atypicality, but not sexual orientation.嗅觉表现由个体的性别非典型性决定,但与性取向无关。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 7;8(11):e80234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080234. eCollection 2013.
7
Association of cerebral networks in resting state with sexual preference of homosexual men: a study of regional homogeneity and functional connectivity.静息态下大脑网络与男同性恋性取向的关联:区域同质性和功能连接研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059426. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
8
Is homosexuality a paraphilia? The evidence for and against.同性恋是性变态吗?支持和反对的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Feb;41(1):237-47. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9900-3.
9
Sexual orientation and the auditory system.性取向与听觉系统。
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011 Apr;32(2):201-13. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
Handedness in homosexual and heterosexual men in the Kinsey interview data.金赛访谈数据中同性恋和异性恋男性的用手习惯
Arch Sex Behav. 1996 Aug;25(4):373-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02437580.