Dünninger P, Einwag J, Sitter H
Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie der Universität Würzburg.
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Mar;46(3):212-4.
Criteria for assessment of the quality of dental restorations should be highly reproducible. To prove reproducibility of a set of modified Ryge-criteria we assessed the quality of 468 fillings (157 amalgam, 155 cast restorations, 156 composites). Assessment was done double-blind by two investigators. The amount of agreement between the investigators ranged from 56.1% to 88.4% depending on the criteria used. The more positive the results of the assessment and the more objectifiable the criteria, the higher was the amount of agreement. For an objective assessment the reproducibility of the method seems to be unsatisfactory.
牙齿修复体质量的评估标准应具有高度可重复性。为证明一组改良的赖格标准的可重复性，我们评估了468颗填充物（157颗汞合金、155颗铸造修复体、156颗复合树脂）的质量。由两名研究人员进行双盲评估。根据所使用的标准，研究人员之间的一致率在56.1%至88.4%之间。评估结果越积极且标准越客观，一致率越高。对于客观评估而言，该方法的可重复性似乎并不理想。
