Kahlmeter G
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Central Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan;14 Suppl 1:169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01856.x.
It has long been acknowledged that the cephalosporin breakpoints used in most European countries and the USA fail to detect many or most extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in Enterobacteriaceae and that all ESBLs are clinically significant. Therefore, microbiological laboratories have undertaken not only regular cephalosporin susceptibility tests based on breakpoints, but also special tests to detect all ESBLs. An increasing accumulation of clinical data implies that the clinical success of third generation cephalosporin therapy is related more to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) than to the presence or absence of an ESBL. However, the breakpoints must be lower than those previously recommended by many breakpoint committees. In Europe, this adjustment has been achieved by EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) through the ongoing process of harmonising European breakpoints. In the USA, the CLSI recently voted to adopt similar guidelines but are waiting to implement these while revising other beta-lactam breakpoints. As Enterobacteriaceae are becoming increasingly resistant, a less 'diehard' interpretation of the relationship among MICs, ESBLs and clinical outcome may provide therapeutic alternatives in difficult situations.
长期以来,人们一直认为,大多数欧洲国家和美国使用的头孢菌素折点无法检测出许多或大多数肠杆菌科细菌中的超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs),并且所有ESBLs都具有临床意义。因此,微生物实验室不仅根据折点进行常规的头孢菌素敏感性试验,还进行特殊试验以检测所有ESBLs。越来越多的临床数据表明,第三代头孢菌素治疗的临床成功率更多地与最低抑菌浓度(MIC)相关,而不是与ESBLs的存在与否相关。然而,折点必须低于许多折点委员会先前推荐的折点。在欧洲,欧盟抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)通过协调欧洲折点的持续过程实现了这种调整。在美国,临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)最近投票决定采用类似的指南,但在修订其他β-内酰胺折点时等待实施这些指南。随着肠杆菌科细菌的耐药性越来越强,对MIC、ESBLs和临床结果之间关系的不那么“顽固”的解释可能会在困难情况下提供治疗选择。