Suppr超能文献

比较欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)和 CLSI 筛选参数在检测临床肠杆菌科分离株产超广谱β-内酰胺酶中的应用。

Comparison of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and CLSI screening parameters for the detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates.

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jan;67(1):159-66. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr400. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and CLSI breakpoints following their revision in 2010, for the detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production in Enterobacteriaceae.

METHODS

236 well-characterized clinical isolates (including 118 ESBL producers) were investigated by antibiotic disc testing with cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefotaxime EUCAST (5 μg/disc), ceftazidime EUCAST (10 μg/disc), cefotaxime CLSI (30 μg/disc) and ceftazidime CLSI (30 μg/disc) with the Kirby-Bauer method. Additionally, synergy phenomena were recorded between amoxicillin/clavulanic acid discs (20/10 μg/disc) and cefepime (30 μg/disc), EUCAST cefotaxime (5 μg/disc), EUCAST ceftazidime (10 μg/disc), CLSI cefotaxime (30 μg/disc) and CLSI ceftazidime [30 μg/disc; disc approximation method (DAM)].

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity of the cefotaxime EUCAST non-susceptible breakpoint equalled sensitivity of the cefotaxime CLSI ESBL screening breakpoint (99.2%). With the ceftazidime EUCAST non-susceptible breakpoint, 27/118 ESBL-producing isolates were not detected, whereas the ceftazidime CLSI ESBL screening breakpoint missed 41/118 ESBL-producing isolates. For cefpodoxime the resistant EUCAST breakpoint showed higher sensitivity for ESBL detection compared with the CLSI ESBL screening breakpoint/disc content (100% versus 98.3%, respectively). Sensitivities of ceftazidime and cefotaxime DAM with CLSI or EUCAST disc contents were comparable (sensitivities ranging from 84.7% to 89.8%). DAM with cefepime displayed the highest overall sensitivity (96.6%). In AmpC-producing isolates, synergy of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid with cefepime showed sensitivity and specificity for ESBL detection of 100% and 97.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EUCAST non-susceptible breakpoints for ceftazidime and cefpodoxime detect more ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates compared with corresponding CLSI ESBL screening breakpoints. Implementation of the cefepime DAM can facilitate ESBL screening, especially in strains producing an AmpC β-lactamase since the test shows high sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

目的

比较 2010 年修订后的欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)和 CLSI 折点在检测肠杆菌科产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)中的性能。

方法

用头孢泊肟、头孢曲松、头孢吡肟、头孢噻肟 EUCAST(5μg/disc)、头孢他啶 EUCAST(10μg/disc)、头孢噻肟 CLSI(30μg/disc)和头孢他啶 CLSI(30μg/disc)的纸片扩散法对 236 株经过充分鉴定的临床分离株(包括 118 株 ESBL 产酶株)进行抗生素药敏试验。此外,还记录了阿莫西林/克拉维酸纸片(20/10μg/disc)与头孢吡肟(30μg/disc)、EUCAST 头孢噻肟(5μg/disc)、EUCAST 头孢他啶(10μg/disc)、CLSI 头孢噻肟(30μg/disc)和 CLSI 头孢他啶[30μg/disc;纸片逼近法(DAM)之间的协同现象。

结果

头孢噻肟 EUCAST 中介耐药折点的总敏感性与头孢噻肟 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点的敏感性相同(99.2%)。用头孢他啶 EUCAST 中介耐药折点,118 株产 ESBL 分离株中有 27 株未检出,而头孢他啶 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点漏检 41 株产 ESBL 分离株。对于头孢泊肟,耐药 EUCAST 折点对 ESBL 检测的敏感性高于 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点/药敏纸片含量(分别为 100%和 98.3%)。头孢他啶和头孢噻肟 DAM 的药敏纸片含量与 CLSI 或 EUCAST 比较,敏感性相当(敏感性范围为 84.7%至 89.8%)。头孢吡肟 DAM 的总敏感性最高(96.6%)。在产 AmpC 酶的分离株中,阿莫西林/克拉维酸与头孢吡肟的协同作用对 ESBL 检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 97.4%。

结论

与相应的 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点相比,头孢他啶和头孢泊肟 EUCAST 中介耐药折点检测到更多产 ESBL 的肠杆菌科分离株。实施头孢吡肟 DAM 可以促进 ESBL 筛选,尤其是在产 AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的菌株中,因为该试验具有较高的敏感性和特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验