Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jan;67(1):159-66. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr400. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
To compare the performance of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and CLSI breakpoints following their revision in 2010, for the detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production in Enterobacteriaceae.
236 well-characterized clinical isolates (including 118 ESBL producers) were investigated by antibiotic disc testing with cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefotaxime EUCAST (5 μg/disc), ceftazidime EUCAST (10 μg/disc), cefotaxime CLSI (30 μg/disc) and ceftazidime CLSI (30 μg/disc) with the Kirby-Bauer method. Additionally, synergy phenomena were recorded between amoxicillin/clavulanic acid discs (20/10 μg/disc) and cefepime (30 μg/disc), EUCAST cefotaxime (5 μg/disc), EUCAST ceftazidime (10 μg/disc), CLSI cefotaxime (30 μg/disc) and CLSI ceftazidime [30 μg/disc; disc approximation method (DAM)].
Overall sensitivity of the cefotaxime EUCAST non-susceptible breakpoint equalled sensitivity of the cefotaxime CLSI ESBL screening breakpoint (99.2%). With the ceftazidime EUCAST non-susceptible breakpoint, 27/118 ESBL-producing isolates were not detected, whereas the ceftazidime CLSI ESBL screening breakpoint missed 41/118 ESBL-producing isolates. For cefpodoxime the resistant EUCAST breakpoint showed higher sensitivity for ESBL detection compared with the CLSI ESBL screening breakpoint/disc content (100% versus 98.3%, respectively). Sensitivities of ceftazidime and cefotaxime DAM with CLSI or EUCAST disc contents were comparable (sensitivities ranging from 84.7% to 89.8%). DAM with cefepime displayed the highest overall sensitivity (96.6%). In AmpC-producing isolates, synergy of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid with cefepime showed sensitivity and specificity for ESBL detection of 100% and 97.4%, respectively.
EUCAST non-susceptible breakpoints for ceftazidime and cefpodoxime detect more ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates compared with corresponding CLSI ESBL screening breakpoints. Implementation of the cefepime DAM can facilitate ESBL screening, especially in strains producing an AmpC β-lactamase since the test shows high sensitivity and specificity.
比较 2010 年修订后的欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)和 CLSI 折点在检测肠杆菌科产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)中的性能。
用头孢泊肟、头孢曲松、头孢吡肟、头孢噻肟 EUCAST(5μg/disc)、头孢他啶 EUCAST(10μg/disc)、头孢噻肟 CLSI(30μg/disc)和头孢他啶 CLSI(30μg/disc)的纸片扩散法对 236 株经过充分鉴定的临床分离株(包括 118 株 ESBL 产酶株)进行抗生素药敏试验。此外,还记录了阿莫西林/克拉维酸纸片(20/10μg/disc)与头孢吡肟(30μg/disc)、EUCAST 头孢噻肟(5μg/disc)、EUCAST 头孢他啶(10μg/disc)、CLSI 头孢噻肟(30μg/disc)和 CLSI 头孢他啶[30μg/disc;纸片逼近法(DAM)之间的协同现象。
头孢噻肟 EUCAST 中介耐药折点的总敏感性与头孢噻肟 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点的敏感性相同(99.2%)。用头孢他啶 EUCAST 中介耐药折点,118 株产 ESBL 分离株中有 27 株未检出,而头孢他啶 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点漏检 41 株产 ESBL 分离株。对于头孢泊肟,耐药 EUCAST 折点对 ESBL 检测的敏感性高于 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点/药敏纸片含量(分别为 100%和 98.3%)。头孢他啶和头孢噻肟 DAM 的药敏纸片含量与 CLSI 或 EUCAST 比较,敏感性相当(敏感性范围为 84.7%至 89.8%)。头孢吡肟 DAM 的总敏感性最高(96.6%)。在产 AmpC 酶的分离株中,阿莫西林/克拉维酸与头孢吡肟的协同作用对 ESBL 检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 97.4%。
与相应的 CLSI ESBL 筛选折点相比,头孢他啶和头孢泊肟 EUCAST 中介耐药折点检测到更多产 ESBL 的肠杆菌科分离株。实施头孢吡肟 DAM 可以促进 ESBL 筛选,尤其是在产 AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的菌株中,因为该试验具有较高的敏感性和特异性。