Berends I M G A, Swart W A J M, Frankena K, Muskens J, Lam T J G M, van Schaik G
Quantitative Veterinary Epidemiology group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Prev Vet Med. 2008 Apr 17;84(1-2):48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.11.002. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of BVDV-free certification of dairy herds on fertility and udder health. Cases were defined as dairy herds that had at least one BVDV-antigen positive animal, subsequently gained the BVDV-free status by participating in the BVDV-control programme of the Animal Health Service (AHS) and maintained this status for at least 2 years. Controls had an unknown status for BVDV and two controls were matched to one case by region and herd size. Data concerning fertility and milk production of all herds were provided by The Dutch Royal Cattle Syndicate (NRS). After validation, data of 79,607 cows of 392 case herds and 124,831 cows of 730 control herds were analysed on ten fertility and three udder health parameters. For the analyses all observations were aggregated at herd level. To account for the matching, differences for fertility parameters were calculated between each of the two pairs of case-control within a matching code. The analyses were performed with these differences as dependent variables. Mixed models and GEE models were used for the statistical analyses of fertility and udder health. Case herds had a significantly lower abortion rate in the BVDV-free period than controls herds (10.3% versus 11.6%, P<0.01) while there was no significant difference for the other fertility parameters. There was no effect on mastitis prevalence or bulk-milk SCC but the mastitis incidence significantly decreased for case herds in the BVDV-free period (cases 0.6 % lower than controls, P<0.05). In our study the effect of getting the BVDV-free status may have been underestimated for several reasons like an unknown status for control herds, not knowing when an acute infection occurred in case herds and not knowing the management for both cases and controls. Interestingly, both significant variables, being abortions and mastitis incidence, are parameters that are more difficult to influence by the farmer than the other parameters (e.g. calving interval).
本研究的目的是调查奶牛群无牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)认证对繁殖力和乳房健康的影响。病例定义为至少有一头BVDV抗原阳性动物的奶牛群,这些牛群随后通过参与动物卫生服务局(AHS)的BVDV控制计划获得了无BVDV状态,并维持该状态至少2年。对照牛群的BVDV状态未知,按地区和牛群规模将两个对照与一个病例进行匹配。荷兰皇家养牛协会(NRS)提供了所有牛群的繁殖力和产奶量数据。经过验证后,对392个病例牛群的79607头奶牛和730个对照牛群的124831头奶牛的数据进行了10项繁殖力参数和3项乳房健康参数的分析。为了进行分析,所有观察结果都汇总到牛群水平。为了考虑匹配因素,在一个匹配代码内计算每对病例对照中两个对照之间繁殖力参数的差异。以这些差异作为因变量进行分析。混合模型和广义估计方程(GEE)模型用于繁殖力和乳房健康的统计分析。病例牛群在无BVDV期间的流产率显著低于对照牛群(10.3%对11.6%,P<0.01),而其他繁殖力参数没有显著差异。对乳腺炎患病率或原料奶体细胞数没有影响,但病例牛群在无BVDV期间的乳腺炎发病率显著降低(病例比对照低0.6%,P<0.05)。在我们的研究中,获得无BVDV状态的影响可能因多种原因而被低估,比如对照牛群的状态未知、不知道病例牛群何时发生急性感染以及不知道病例和对照的管理情况。有趣的是,两个显著变量,即流产和乳腺炎发病率,是农民比其他参数(如产犊间隔)更难影响的参数。