关于残疾的辩论

Debating disability.

作者信息

Shakespeare T

机构信息

PEALS, Newcastle University, Citygate, St James Boulevard, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4JH, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):11-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019992.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2006.019992

PMID:18156512

Abstract

This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the uses and abuses of the expressivist argument. Disability is an emerging field of enquiry and constructive debate is to be welcomed.

摘要

本文回应了爱德华兹、霍尔姆、科赫、托马斯和韦马斯对《残疾：权利与错误》（2006年）的评论。在概述了残疾研究作为一门学科的近期历史之后，本文探讨了：残疾研究的政治性质、本体论和定义问题，以及表现主义论点的运用与滥用。残疾是一个新兴的研究领域，建设性的辩论值得欢迎。